These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

920 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24831050)

  • 1. False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies.
    Glickman ME; Rao SR; Schultz MR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Aug; 67(8):850-7. PubMed ID: 24831050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response to letter by Frane: "False discovery rate control is not always a replacement for Bonferroni-type adjustment".
    Glickman ME; Rao SR; Schultz MR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():264. PubMed ID: 26139437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. False discovery rate control is not always a replacement for Bonferroni adjustment (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:850-7).
    Frane AV
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():263. PubMed ID: 26130494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gaining power in multiple testing of interval hypotheses via conditionalization.
    Ellis JL; Pecanka J; Goeman JJ
    Biostatistics; 2020 Apr; 21(2):e65-e79. PubMed ID: 30247521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hidden multiplicity in exploratory multiway ANOVA: Prevalence and remedies.
    Cramer AO; van Ravenzwaaij D; Matzke D; Steingroever H; Wetzels R; Grasman RP; Waldorp LJ; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):640-7. PubMed ID: 26374437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strategies in adjusting for multiple comparisons: A primer for pediatric surgeons.
    Staffa SJ; Zurakowski D
    J Pediatr Surg; 2020 Sep; 55(9):1699-1705. PubMed ID: 32029234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. POWER-ENHANCED MULTIPLE DECISION FUNCTIONS CONTROLLING FAMILY-WISE ERROR AND FALSE DISCOVERY RATES.
    Peña EA; Habiger JD; Wu W
    Ann Stat; 2011 Feb; 39(1):556-583. PubMed ID: 25018568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The fallback procedure for evaluating a single family of hypotheses.
    Wiens BL; Dmitrienko A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):929-42. PubMed ID: 16279352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluations of the Optimal Discovery Procedure for Multiple Testing.
    Rubin DB
    Int J Biostat; 2016 May; 12(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 27227716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Control procedures and estimators of the false discovery rate and their application in low-dimensional settings: an empirical investigation.
    Brinster R; Köttgen A; Tayo BO; Schumacher M; Sekula P;
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Mar; 19(1):78. PubMed ID: 29499647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple testing in large-scale genetic studies.
    Bouaziz M; Jeanmougin M; Guedj M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 888():213-33. PubMed ID: 22665284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Power and type I error rate of false discovery rate approaches in genome-wide association studies.
    Yang Q; Cui J; Chazaro I; Cupples LA; Demissie S
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S134. PubMed ID: 16451593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A generalized Sidak-Holm procedure and control of generalized error rates under independence.
    Guo W; Romano J
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article3. PubMed ID: 17402918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Weighted multiple hypothesis testing procedures.
    Kang G; Ye K; Liu N; Allison DB; Gao G
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8(1):Article23. PubMed ID: 19409067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On generalized fixed sequence procedures for controlling the FWER.
    Qiu Z; Guo W; Lynch G
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(30):3968-83. PubMed ID: 26228241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
    Liu P; Hwang JT
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of false discovery rate procedure to pairwise comparisons of refractive index of glass fragments.
    Pawluk-Kołc M; Zieba-Palus J; Parczewski A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jun; 160(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 16221535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The problem of multiple testing and solutions for genome-wide studies].
    Gyorffy B; Gyorffy A; Tulassay Z
    Orv Hetil; 2005 Mar; 146(12):559-63. PubMed ID: 15853065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of multiple testing adjustment methods with block-correlation positively-dependent tests.
    Stevens JR; Al Masud A; Suyundikov A
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0176124. PubMed ID: 28453517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Many tests of significance: new methods for controlling type I errors.
    Keselman HJ; Miller CW; Holland B
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Dec; 16(4):420-31. PubMed ID: 22040371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 46.