These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24832169)

  • 1. The impact of water use fees on dispatching and water requirements for water-cooled power plants in Texas.
    Sanders KT; Blackhurst MF; King CW; Webber ME
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jun; 48(12):7128-34. PubMed ID: 24832169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatially and Temporally Resolved Analysis of Environmental Trade-Offs in Electricity Generation.
    Peer RA; Garrison JB; Timms CP; Sanders KT
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Apr; 50(8):4537-45. PubMed ID: 26967826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Geographic, technologic, and economic analysis of using reclaimed water for thermoelectric power plant cooling.
    Stillwell AS; Webber ME
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Apr; 48(8):4588-95. PubMed ID: 24625241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Costs for integrating wind into the future ERCOT system with related costs for savings in CO2 emissions.
    Lu X; McElroy MB; Sluzas NA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Apr; 45(7):3160-6. PubMed ID: 21375280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Critical review: Uncharted waters? The future of the electricity-water nexus.
    Sanders KT
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jan; 49(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 25486256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Controls on water use for thermoelectric generation: case study Texas, US.
    Scanlon BR; Reedy RC; Duncan I; Mullican WF; Young M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Oct; 47(19):11326-34. PubMed ID: 23937226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Near-term implications of a ban on new coal-fired power plants in the United States.
    Newcomer A; Apt J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jun; 43(11):3995-4001. PubMed ID: 19569321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic Management of NOx and SO2 Emissions in the Texas and Mid-Atlantic Electric Power Systems and Implications for Air Quality.
    McDonald-Buller E; Kimura Y; Craig M; McGaughey G; Allen D; Webster M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Feb; 50(3):1611-9. PubMed ID: 26727552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-tech coal energy cheaper than Texas wind power.
    Cooney CM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Nov; 39(22):455A. PubMed ID: 16323744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Costs of solar and wind power variability for reducing CO2 emissions.
    Lueken C; Cohen GE; Apt J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(17):9761-7. PubMed ID: 22877159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Water use at pulverized coal power plants with postcombustion carbon capture and storage.
    Zhai H; Rubin ES; Versteeg PL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2479-85. PubMed ID: 21329343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impacts of electricity dispatch protocols on the emission reductions due to wind power and carbon tax.
    Yu Y; Rajagopal R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Feb; 49(4):2568-76. PubMed ID: 25607824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost of wind energy: comparing distant wind resources to local resources in the midwestern United States.
    Hoppock DC; Patiño-Echeverri D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Nov; 44(22):8758-65. PubMed ID: 20931984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost analysis of concepts for a demand oriented biogas supply for flexible power generation.
    Hahn H; Ganagin W; Hartmann K; Wachendorf M
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Oct; 170():211-220. PubMed ID: 25146313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-efficiency trade-off and the design of thermoelectric power generators.
    Yazawa K; Shakouri A
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 45(17):7548-53. PubMed ID: 21793542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electricity generation: options for reduction in carbon emissions.
    Whittington HW
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1653-68. PubMed ID: 12460490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emissions and Cost Implications of Controlled Electric Vehicle Charging in the U.S. PJM Interconnection.
    Weis A; Michalek JJ; Jaramillo P; Lueken R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 May; 49(9):5813-9. PubMed ID: 25830471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of renewable energy supply for green ports with a case study.
    Sadek I; Elgohary M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Feb; 27(5):5547-5558. PubMed ID: 31853847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The costs, air quality, and human health effects of meeting peak electricity demand with installed backup generators.
    Gilmore EA; Lave LB; Adams PJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Nov; 40(22):6887-93. PubMed ID: 17153991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multi-period optimization model for energy planning with CO(2) emission consideration.
    Mirzaesmaeeli H; Elkamel A; Douglas PL; Croiset E; Gupta M
    J Environ Manage; 2010 May; 91(5):1063-70. PubMed ID: 20149519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.