These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24834024)

  • 1. Acute stress affects risk taking but not ambiguity aversion.
    Buckert M; Schwieren C; Kudielka BM; Fiebach CJ
    Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():82. PubMed ID: 24834024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning about the Ellsberg Paradox reduces, but does not abolish, ambiguity aversion.
    Jia R; Furlong E; Gao S; Santos LR; Levy I
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0228782. PubMed ID: 32130214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strategic and non-strategic problem gamblers differ on decision-making under risk and ambiguity.
    Lorains FK; Dowling NA; Enticott PG; Bradshaw JL; Trueblood JS; Stout JC
    Addiction; 2014 Jul; 109(7):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24450756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neither Threat of Shock nor Acute Psychosocial Stress Affects Ambiguity Attitudes.
    Sambrano DC; Lormestoire A; Raio C; Glimcher P; Phelps EA
    Affect Sci; 2022; 3(2):425-437. PubMed ID: 35791419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ambiguity aversion in schizophrenia: An fMRI study of decision-making under risk and ambiguity.
    Fujino J; Hirose K; Tei S; Kawada R; Tsurumi K; Matsukawa N; Miyata J; Sugihara G; Yoshihara Y; Ideno T; Aso T; Takemura K; Fukuyama H; Murai T; Takahashi H
    Schizophr Res; 2016 Dec; 178(1-3):94-101. PubMed ID: 27623361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emotion and decision-making under uncertainty: Physiological arousal predicts increased gambling during ambiguity but not risk.
    FeldmanHall O; Glimcher P; Baker AL; Phelps EA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Oct; 145(10):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 27690508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Five-year-olds do not show ambiguity aversion in a risk and ambiguity task with physical objects.
    Li R; Roberts RC; Huettel SA; Brannon EM
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Jul; 159():319-326. PubMed ID: 28359540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does ambiguity aversion influence the framing effect during decision making?
    Osmont A; Cassotti M; Agogué M; Houdé O; Moutier S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Apr; 22(2):572-7. PubMed ID: 25030206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acute psychosocial stress and everyday moral decision-making in young healthy men: The impact of cortisol.
    Singer N; Sommer M; Döhnel K; Zänkert S; Wüst S; Kudielka BM
    Horm Behav; 2017 Jul; 93():72-81. PubMed ID: 28495558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Everyday moral decision-making after acute stress exposure: do social closeness and timing matter?
    Singer N; Binapfl J; Sommer M; Wüst S; Kudielka BM
    Stress; 2021 Jul; 24(4):468-473. PubMed ID: 33138682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attitudes toward risk and ambiguity in patients with autism spectrum disorder.
    Fujino J; Tei S; Hashimoto RI; Itahashi T; Ohta H; Kanai C; Okada R; Kubota M; Nakamura M; Kato N; Takahashi H
    Mol Autism; 2017; 8():45. PubMed ID: 28824795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early stages of the acute physical stress response increase loss aversion and learning on decision making: A Bayesian approach.
    Molins F; Serrano MÁ; Alacreu-Crespo A
    Physiol Behav; 2021 Aug; 237():113459. PubMed ID: 33989652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stress-related changes in financial risk taking: Considering joint effects of cortisol and affect.
    von Helversen B; Rieskamp J
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Aug; 57(8):e13560. PubMed ID: 32133666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stress effects on framed decisions: there are differences for gains and losses.
    Pabst S; Brand M; Wolf OT
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2013; 7():142. PubMed ID: 24130523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Logical decisions after a psychosocial stressor: The late phase of acute stress reduces loss aversion.
    Molins F; Hassen NB; Paz M; Costa R; Serrano MÃ
    Physiol Behav; 2023 Sep; 268():114232. PubMed ID: 37178853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating ambiguity preferences and perceptions in multiple prior models: Evidence from the field.
    Dimmock SG; Kouwenberg R; Mitchell OS; Peijnenburg K
    J Risk Uncertain; 2015 Dec; 51(3):219-244. PubMed ID: 26924890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Risk and Ambiguity Attitudes.
    Blankenstein NE; Peper JS; Crone EA; van Duijvenvoorde ACK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Nov; 29(11):1845-1859. PubMed ID: 28686139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increased Risk Taking in Relation to Chronic Stress in Adults.
    Ceccato S; Kudielka BM; Schwieren C
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():2036. PubMed ID: 26858663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prolonged Effects of Acute Stress on Decision-Making under Risk: A Human Psychophysiological Study.
    Yamakawa K; Ohira H; Matsunaga M; Isowa T
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():444. PubMed ID: 27679566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Myopic Loss Aversion under Ambiguity and Gender Effects.
    Iturbe-Ormaetxe I; Ponti G; Tomás J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0161477. PubMed ID: 27973545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.