166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24834483)
1. Oblique lateral radiographs and bitewings; estimation of organ doses in head and neck region with Monte Carlo calculations.
Aps JK; Scott JM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20130419. PubMed ID: 24834483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation.
Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; White SC
J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 139(9):1237-43. PubMed ID: 18762634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of radiation exposure in dental cone-beam computerized tomography with the use of metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters and Monte Carlo simulations.
Koivisto J; Kiljunen T; Tapiovaara M; Wolff J; Kortesniemi M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Sep; 114(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 22862982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of adult and child radiation equivalent doses from 2 dental cone-beam computed tomography units.
Al Najjar A; Colosi D; Dauer LT; Prins R; Patchell G; Branets I; Goren AD; Faber RD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):784-92. PubMed ID: 23726328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effective radiation dose of ProMax 3D cone-beam computerized tomography scanner with different dental protocols.
Qu XM; Li G; Ludlow JB; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Dec; 110(6):770-6. PubMed ID: 20952220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Absorbed doses from intraoral radiography with special emphasis on collimator dimensions.
Stenström B; Henrikson CO; Holm B; Richter S
Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(1-2):59-71. PubMed ID: 3458320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 3: Conversion coefficients for reconstruction of organ doses achieved during chest X-ray examinations].
Seidenbusch MC; Regulla D; Schneider K
Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1061-81. PubMed ID: 19235700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations.
Granlund C; Thilander-Klang A; Ylhan B; Lofthag-Hansen S; Ekestubbe A
Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20151052. PubMed ID: 27452261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 5: organ doses in chest radiography].
Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K
Rofo; 2009 May; 181(5):454-71. PubMed ID: 19391068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology--part 2: the PAEDOS algorithm for computer-assisted dose reconstruction in pediatric radiology and results for X-ray examinations of the skull].
Seidenbusch MC; Regulla D; Schneider K
Rofo; 2008 Jun; 180(6):522-39. PubMed ID: 18484514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of various approaches for assessing dose indicators and patient organ doses resulting from radiotherapy cone-beam CT.
Rampado O; Giglioli FR; Rossetti V; Fiandra C; Ragona R; Ropolo R
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2515. PubMed ID: 27147362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the effective dose from scanography with periapical radiography.
Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Sanderink G; De Smet E; Nowak B; Van Dam J; Van Steenberghe D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 12058262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.
Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 13679353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conversion coefficients for determining organ doses in paediatric spine radiography.
Seidenbusch M; Schneider K
Pediatr Radiol; 2014 Apr; 44(4):434-56. PubMed ID: 24509648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiation doses of commonly used dental radiographic surveys.
Freeman JP; Brand JW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Mar; 77(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 8170662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of lead foil for reducing doses in the head and neck: a simulation study using digital intraoral systems.
Nejaim Y; Silva AI; Brasil DM; Vasconcelos KF; Haiter Neto F; Boscolo FN
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150065. PubMed ID: 26084474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiation doses and risks in dento-maxillofacial radiology.
Borrman H; Holmberg P
Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1989; 85(6):457-79. PubMed ID: 2699037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Organ and effective dose conversion coefficients for radiographic examinations of the pediatric skull estimated by Monte Carlo methods.
Stratakis J; Damilakis J; Gourtsoyiannis N
Eur Radiol; 2005 Sep; 15(9):1948-58. PubMed ID: 15776242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimising radiographic bitewing examination to adult and juvenile patients through the use of anthropomorphic phantoms.
Dauer LT; Branets I; Stabulas-Savage J; Quinn B; Miodownik D; Dauer ZL; Colosi D; Hershkowitz D; Goren A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Jan; 158(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 23918744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
