These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

980 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24834516)

  • 1. Policy: NIH to balance sex in cell and animal studies.
    Clayton JA; Collins FS
    Nature; 2014 May; 509(7500):282-3. PubMed ID: 24834516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. NIH policy: status quo is also costly.
    McCullough LD; McCarthy MM; de Vries GJ
    Nature; 2014 Jun; 510(7505):340. PubMed ID: 24943945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. NIH policy: mandate goes too far.
    Fields RD
    Nature; 2014 Jun; 510(7505):340. PubMed ID: 24943947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NIH responds to critics on peer review.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):835. PubMed ID: 18548033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Racial bias continues to haunt NIH grants.
    Check Hayden E
    Nature; 2015 Nov; 527(7578):286-7. PubMed ID: 26581270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recommendations concerning the new U.S. National Institutes of Health initiative to balance the sex of cells and animals in preclinical research.
    Sandberg K; Umans JG;
    FASEB J; 2015 May; 29(5):1646-52. PubMed ID: 25713032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lobbying sways NIH grants.
    Reardon S
    Nature; 2014 Nov; 515(7525):19. PubMed ID: 25373655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 222 NIH grants: 22 researchers.
    Hand E
    Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7185):258-9. PubMed ID: 18354436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Financial anatomy of neuroscience research.
    Fields H
    Ann Neurol; 2008 Jan; 63(1):124. PubMed ID: 17474111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review reviewed.
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7159):115. PubMed ID: 17851475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Addressing the decline in NIH pain research funding.
    Max MB
    J Pain; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1074-6. PubMed ID: 19038769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revamp for NIH grants.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2008 Feb; 451(7182):1035. PubMed ID: 18305502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. NIH plans grant-review overhaul to reduce bias.
    Kozlov M
    Nature; 2022 Dec; 612(7941):602-603. PubMed ID: 36494447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomedical research policy. NIH funding shifts with disease lobbying, study suggests.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2012 Oct; 338(6104):181. PubMed ID: 23066052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. NIH mulls rules for validating key results.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2013 Aug; 500(7460):14-6. PubMed ID: 23903729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Research grants: Conform and be funded.
    Nicholson JM; Ioannidis JP
    Nature; 2012 Dec; 492(7427):34-6. PubMed ID: 23222591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Knowing it and proving it are two different things.
    Clay PG
    J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2015; 55(4):464. PubMed ID: 26161492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NIH: grants revamp needs grounding in evidence.
    Hannun YA
    Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7189):811. PubMed ID: 18421328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shorter NIH grant form launches.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7277):12-3. PubMed ID: 20054365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gender bias goes away when grant reviewers focus on the science.
    Guglielmi G
    Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7690):14-15. PubMed ID: 29388971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 49.