98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2483560)
1. [Human chromosome analysis by automatic image analyzing system].
Nakagawara K
Rinsho Byori; 1989 Feb; Spec No 80():59-69. PubMed ID: 2483560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic karyotype analysis.
Graham J; Piper J
Methods Mol Biol; 1994; 29():141-85. PubMed ID: 8032408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Chromosome analysis using image processing. Recent aspects and perspectives].
Malet P; Geneix A; Bonton P; Grouche L; Perissel B
Ann Genet; 1989; 32(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 2683979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [A new system of chromosome analysis by image treatment: the chromoscan].
Malet P; Geneix A; Bonton P; Catinot P; Perissel B
C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1987; 181(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 2957039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bivariate chromosome analysis using a commercial flow cytometer.
Carter NP
Methods Mol Biol; 1994; 29():187-204. PubMed ID: 7518284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Automated chromosome classification system using an integrated intensity profile].
Sekiya T
Iyodenshi To Seitai Kogaku; 1983 Jun; 21(3):158-65. PubMed ID: 6198542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Identification of isolated metaphase chromosomes. II. A comparison with the recognizability of chromosomes in metaphase plates].
Glebov OK; Polianskaia GG; Pinaev GP
Tsitologiia; 1981 Sep; 23(9):1041-6. PubMed ID: 6170138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A system for automatic metaphase finding and semi-automatic chromosome analysis.
van den Berg HT; de France HF
Microsc Acta Suppl; 1979; (3):213-20. PubMed ID: 396455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Immunogold labeling of metaphase cells.
Perry PE; Thomson EJ
Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1986; 41(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 2420534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new method for the preparation of metaphase chromosomes for flow analysis.
Sillar R; Young BD
J Histochem Cytochem; 1981 Jan; 29(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 6162882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The DNA-based human karyotype.
Mayall BH; Carrano AV; Moore DH; Ashworth LK; Bennett DE; Mendelsohn ML
Cytometry; 1984 Jul; 5(4):376-85. PubMed ID: 6205836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Data-driven homologue matching for chromosome identification.
Stanley RJ; Keller JM; Gader P; Caldwell CW
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Jun; 17(3):451-62. PubMed ID: 9735908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aspects of automated chromosome analysis. Different representations of banded human chromosomes and their cytogenetic evaluation.
Lundsteen C
Dan Med Bull; 1980 Feb; 27(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 6156802
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated chromosome analysis using the Magiscan Image Analyser.
Graham J; Taylor CJ
Anal Quant Cytol; 1980 Dec; 2(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 7469198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automatic classification of chromosomes as part of a routine system for clinical analysis.
Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Maahr J
Cytometry; 1986 Jan; 7(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 3948602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Operator-assisted semi-automatic karyotyping of banded metaphases.
Wulf HC
Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1977; 19(2-3):146-58. PubMed ID: 908202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Homologue matching using the Choquet integral.
Stanley RJ; Keller J; Gader P; Caldwell CW
Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 34():315-20. PubMed ID: 9603059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fully automatic chromosome segmentation.
Ji L
Cytometry; 1994 Nov; 17(3):196-208. PubMed ID: 7851156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On fully automatic feature measurement for banded chromosome classification.
Piper J; Granum E
Cytometry; 1989 May; 10(3):242-55. PubMed ID: 2714109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Karyotyping of comparative genomic hybridization human metaphases using kernel nearest-neighbor algorithm.
Yu K; Ji L
Cytometry; 2002 Aug; 48(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 12210144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
