These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2483560)
21. Chromosome analysis by image processing in a computerized environment. Clinical applications. Malet P; Benkhalifa M; Perissel B; Geneix A; Le Corvaisier B J Radiat Res; 1992 Mar; 33 Suppl():171-88. PubMed ID: 1507168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effects of image manipulation on automated karyotyping. Stanley RJ; Caldwell CW; Keller J; Gader P Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 33():305-10. PubMed ID: 9731376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A rule-based computer scheme for centromere identification and polarity assignment of metaphase chromosomes. Wang X; Zheng B; Li S; Mulvihill JJ; Liu H Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Jan; 89(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 18082909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A computer-controlled semi-automated system for processing human blood to produce chromosome slides. Keenan RL; Mount BE; Persinger G; Melnyk J Biomed Sci Instrum; 1980 Apr 21-22; 16():117-22. PubMed ID: 7407294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Peripheral blood smears: preparation and staining are still important. Brown KA Clin Lab Sci; 1990; 3(5):311-2. PubMed ID: 10150909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. On the selection of systems for automated cytogenetic analysis. Lundsteen C; Martin AO Am J Med Genet; 1989 Jan; 32(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 2650549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Spectral karyotyping analysis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Singh B; Gogineni S; Goberdhan A; Sacks P; Shaha A; Shah J; Rao P Laryngoscope; 2001 Sep; 111(9):1545-50. PubMed ID: 11568603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Counterstaining human chromosomes for flow karyology. Meyne J; Bartholdi MF; Travis G; Cram LS Cytometry; 1984 Nov; 5(6):580-3. PubMed ID: 6083852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Use of bar code labels on collection tubes for specimen management in the clinical laboratory. Tilzer LL; Jones RW Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Dec; 112(12):1200-2. PubMed ID: 3190406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Preparation techniques of blood and bone marrow for automated white cell analysis. Smit JW; Huiges W; Halie MR Microsc Acta Suppl; 1980; Suppl 4():96-101. PubMed ID: 6157079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Automatic chromosome analysis. II. Karyotyping of banded human chromosomes using band transition sequences. Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Granum E; Philip J; Philip K Clin Genet; 1981 Jan; 19(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 7460378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Protocols of procedures and techniques in chromosome analysis of tumor stem cell cultures in soft agar. Trent JM Prog Clin Biol Res; 1980; 48():345-9. PubMed ID: 6163160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Karyotype of human ES cells during extended culture. Buzzard JJ; Gough NM; Crook JM; Colman A Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Apr; 22(4):381-2; author reply 382. PubMed ID: 15060545 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Automated cytogenetic analysis: accomplishments, present status and practical future possibilities. Lundsteen C; Philip J Clin Genet; 1989 Nov; 36(5):386-91. PubMed ID: 2689009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Automated chromosome classification limitations due to image processing. Stanley R; Keller J; Gader P; Caldwell CW Biomed Sci Instrum; 1995; 31():183-8. PubMed ID: 7654959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]