BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2483601)

  • 1. [Reliability of endorectal echography of the prostate in the screening and staging of prostatic cancer].
    Corbusier A; Vanden Bossche M; Mendes Leal A; Simon J; Wespes E; Van Regemorter G; Schulman CC
    Acta Urol Belg; 1989; 57(4):831-41. PubMed ID: 2483601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Transrectal echography and cancer of the prostate. II. Comparison with digital examination of the rectum].
    Abad Menor F; Espuela Orgaz R; Nogueras Gimeno MA; Pérez Arbej JA; Martínez Pérez E; Arnaiz Esteban F
    Arch Esp Urol; 1990 Apr; 43(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 2196005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of digital rectal examination and biopsy results with the radical prostatectomy specimen.
    Obek C; Louis P; Civantos F; Soloway MS
    J Urol; 1999 Feb; 161(2):494-8; discussion 498-9. PubMed ID: 9915434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective evaluation of prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen density in the detection of nonpalpable and stage T1C carcinoma of the prostate.
    Presti JC; Hovey R; Carroll PR; Shinohara K
    J Urol; 1996 Nov; 156(5):1685-90. PubMed ID: 8863571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Transrectal echography of the prostate and its value in screening for prostatic carcinoma].
    Kil PJ; Hendrikx AJ; Debruyne FM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Feb; 134(8):385-90. PubMed ID: 2179743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prostate cancer screening within a prostate specific antigen range of 3 to 3.9 ng./ml.: a comparison of digital rectal examination and free prostate specific antigen as supplemental screening tests.
    Mäkinen T; Tammela TL; Hakama M; Stenman UH; Rannikko S; Aro J; Juusela H; Määttänen L; Auvinen A
    J Urol; 2001 Oct; 166(4):1339-42. PubMed ID: 11547069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnosis of prostate cancer by transrectal ultrasound.
    Lee F; Torp-Pedersen ST; McLeary RD
    Urol Clin North Am; 1989 Nov; 16(4):663-73. PubMed ID: 2479161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Predictive value of prostate specific antigen density in the detection of prostate cancer in patients with elevated prostate specific antigen levels and normal digital rectal findings or stage A prostate cancer].
    Iwaki H; Kajita Y; Shimizu Y; Yamauchi T
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 2001 Mar; 47(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 11329957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Staging of prostate cancer. Value of ultrasonography.
    Scardino PT; Shinohara K; Wheeler TM; Carter SS
    Urol Clin North Am; 1989 Nov; 16(4):713-34. PubMed ID: 2683301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparative diagnostic value of ultrasonics and rectal examination in prostatic cancer in a series of 213 patients].
    Devonec M; Chapelon JY; Cathignol D; Dubernard JM
    J Urol (Paris); 1986; 92(4):231-7. PubMed ID: 3537141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Experience with transrectal ultrasonic studies in patients with prostatic tumors].
    Romics I; Rüssel C; Bach D
    Orv Hetil; 1990 Feb; 131(7):359-62. PubMed ID: 2183150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal predictors of prostate cancer on repeat prostate biopsy: a prospective study of 1,051 men.
    Djavan B; Zlotta A; Remzi M; Ghawidel K; Basharkhah A; Schulman CC; Marberger M
    J Urol; 2000 Apr; 163(4):1144-8; discussion 1148-9. PubMed ID: 10737484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The incidence of the variability of the free PSA/total PSA ratio on the early diagnosis of prostate cancer].
    de La Taille A; Houlgatte A; Houdelette P; Berlizot P; Fournier R; Ricordel I
    Prog Urol; 1997 Jun; 7(3):455-63. PubMed ID: 9273075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transrectal ultrasound versus digital rectal examination for the staging of carcinoma of the prostate: results of a prospective, multi-institutional trial.
    Smith JA; Scardino PT; Resnick MI; Hernandez AD; Rose SC; Egger MJ
    J Urol; 1997 Mar; 157(3):902-6. PubMed ID: 9072596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prostate cancer: comparison of transrectal US and digital rectal examination for screening.
    Lee F; Littrup PJ; Torp-Pedersen ST; Mettlin C; McHugh TA; Gray JM; Kumasaka GH; McLeary RD
    Radiology; 1988 Aug; 168(2):389-94. PubMed ID: 3293108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of percent free prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen density as methods to enhance prostate specific antigen specificity in early prostate cancer detection in men with normal rectal examination and prostate specific antigen between 4.1 and 10 ng./ml.
    Morote J; Raventós CX; Lorente JA; Lopez-Pacios MA; Encabo G; de Torres I; Andreu J
    J Urol; 1997 Aug; 158(2):502-4. PubMed ID: 9224333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Transrectal prostate sonography in early cancer recognition].
    Frentzel-Beyme B; Aurich B; Drakopoulos A
    Computertomographie; 1983 Dec; 3(4):153-8. PubMed ID: 6199109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic value of transrectal ultrasonography in prostatic cancer.
    Devonec M
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1987; 243B():1-10. PubMed ID: 3309977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening for prostate cancer.
    Pode D; Shapiro A; Lebensart P; Meretyk S; Katz G; Barak V
    Isr J Med Sci; 1995; 31(2-3):125-8. PubMed ID: 7538101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finasteride improves the sensitivity of digital rectal examination for prostate cancer detection.
    Thompson IM; Tangen CM; Goodman PJ; Lucia MS; Parnes HL; Lippman SM; Coltman CA
    J Urol; 2007 May; 177(5):1749-52. PubMed ID: 17437804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.