These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24836519)

  • 1. The use of Bayesian hierarchical models for adaptive randomization in biomarker-driven phase II studies.
    Barry WT; Perou CM; Marcom PK; Carey LA; Ibrahim JG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(1):66-88. PubMed ID: 24836519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical inference for response adaptive randomization procedures with adjusted optimal allocation proportions.
    Zhu H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(5):732-740. PubMed ID: 27937121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian adaptive patient enrollment restriction to identify a sensitive subpopulation using a continuous biomarker in a randomized phase 2 trial.
    Ohwada S; Morita S
    Pharm Stat; 2016 Sep; 15(5):420-9. PubMed ID: 27485377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved adaptive randomization strategies for a seamless Phase I/II dose-finding design.
    Yan D; Wages NA; Dressler EV
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):333-347. PubMed ID: 30451068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of single-arm vs. randomized phase II clinical trials: a Bayesian approach.
    Sambucini V
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):474-89. PubMed ID: 24896838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Bayesian adaptive design for biomarker trials with linked treatments.
    Wason JM; Abraham JE; Baird RD; Gournaris I; Vallier AL; Brenton JD; Earl HM; Mander AP
    Br J Cancer; 2015 Sep; 113(5):699-705. PubMed ID: 26263479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of Bayesian hierarchical models for phase I/II clinical trials in oncology.
    Yada S; Hamada C
    Pharm Stat; 2017 Mar; 16(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 27892650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive allocation for binary outcomes using decreasingly informative priors.
    Sabo RT
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(3):569-78. PubMed ID: 24697793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-stage response adaptive randomization designs for multi-arm trials with binary outcome.
    Lu X; Shan G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jul; 34(4):526-538. PubMed ID: 37452825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian adaptive design for targeted therapy development in lung cancer--a step toward personalized medicine.
    Zhou X; Liu S; Kim ES; Herbst RS; Lee JJ
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(3):181-93. PubMed ID: 18559407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response adaptive randomization procedures in seamless phase II/III clinical trials.
    Zhu H; Piao J; Lee JJ; Hu F; Zhang L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2020; 30(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 31454295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Leveraging historical data into oncology development programs: Two case studies of phase 2 Bayesian augmented control trial designs.
    Smith CL; Thomas Z; Enas N; Thorn K; Lahn M; Benhadji K; Cleverly A
    Pharm Stat; 2020 May; 19(3):276-290. PubMed ID: 31903699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias in retrospective analyses of biomarker effect using data from an outcome-adaptive randomized trial.
    Ji L; McShane LM; Krailo M; Sposto R
    Clin Trials; 2019 Dec; 16(6):599-609. PubMed ID: 31581815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An extension of Bayesian predictive sample size selection designs for monitoring efficacy and safety.
    Teramukai S; Daimon T; Zohar S
    Stat Med; 2015 Sep; 34(22):3029-39. PubMed ID: 26038148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An adaptive trial design to optimize dose-schedule regimes with delayed outcomes.
    Lin R; Thall PF; Yuan Y
    Biometrics; 2020 Mar; 76(1):304-315. PubMed ID: 31273750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A phase I/II seamless dose escalation/expansion with adaptive randomization scheme (SEARS).
    Pan H; Xie F; Liu P; Xia J; Ji Y
    Clin Trials; 2014 Feb; 11(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 24137041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Bayesian decision-theoretic sequential response-adaptive randomization design.
    Jiang F; Jack Lee J; Müller P
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(12):1975-94. PubMed ID: 23315678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian hierarchical modeling of patient subpopulations: efficient designs of Phase II oncology clinical trials.
    Berry SM; Broglio KR; Groshen S; Berry DA
    Clin Trials; 2013 Oct; 10(5):720-34. PubMed ID: 23983156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. BASIC: A Bayesian adaptive synthetic-control design for phase II clinical trials.
    Jiang L; Thall PF; Yan F; Kopetz S; Yuan Y
    Clin Trials; 2023 Oct; 20(5):486-496. PubMed ID: 37313712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomarker threshold adaptive designs for survival endpoints.
    Diao G; Dong J; Zeng D; Ke C; Rong A; Ibrahim JG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1038-1054. PubMed ID: 29436940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.