900 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24836659)
1. Affective disorders influence clinical outcomes after revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic adjacent-segment disease, recurrent stenosis, or pseudarthrosis: clinical article.
Adogwa O; Verla T; Thompson P; Penumaka A; Kudyba K; Johnson K; Fulchiero E; Miller T; Hoang KB; Cheng J; Bagley CA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 24836659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 21937282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article.
Adogwa O; Carr RK; Kudyba K; Karikari I; Bagley CA; Gokaslan ZL; Theodore N; Cheng JS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23231354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preoperative Zung depression scale predicts patient satisfaction independent of the extent of improvement after revision lumbar surgery.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Bydon A; Cheng JS; Asher AL; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 23422730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychosocial factors and surgical outcomes: are elderly depressed patients less satisfied with surgery?
Adogwa O; Carr K; Fatemi P; Verla T; Gazcon G; Gottfried O; Bagley C; Cheng J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep; 39(19):1614-9. PubMed ID: 24921847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 2. A cost-effectiveness analysis: clinical article.
Adogwa O; Owens R; Karikari I; Agarwal V; Gottfried ON; Bagley CA; Isaacs RE; Cheng JS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 23231358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Revision lumbar fusions have higher rates of reoperation and result in worse clinical outcomes compared to primary lumbar fusions.
Lambrechts MJ; Toci GR; Siegel N; Karamian BA; Canseco JA; Hilibrand AS; Schroeder GD; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK
Spine J; 2023 Jan; 23(1):105-115. PubMed ID: 36064090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term outcomes after revision neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the effectiveness of surgery.
Mendenhall SK; Parker SL; Adogwa O; Shau DN; Cheng J; Aaronson O; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Oct; 27(7):353-7. PubMed ID: 25247253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laminectomy and extension of instrumented fusion improves 2-year pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with adjacent segment disease: defining the long-term effectiveness of surgery.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Aaronson O; Cheng J; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
World Neurosurg; 2013 Dec; 80(6):893-6. PubMed ID: 22381277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term outcomes of revision fusion for lumbar pseudarthrosis: clinical article.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau D; Mendelhall SK; Cheng J; Aaronson O; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Oct; 15(4):393-8. PubMed ID: 21699473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of depression symptoms on patient expectations and clinical outcomes in the surgical management of spinal stenosis.
Urban-Baeza A; Zárate-Kalfópulos B; Romero-Vargas S; Obil-Chavarría C; Brenes-Rojas L; Reyes-Sánchez A
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 25380536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Anderson WN; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2012 Dec; 12(12):1122-8. PubMed ID: 23158968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation of preoperative depression and somatic perception scales with postoperative disability and quality of life after lumbar discectomy.
Chaichana KL; Mukherjee D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Feb; 14(2):261-7. PubMed ID: 21214315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors influencing 2-year health care costs in patients undergoing revision lumbar fusion procedures.
Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Apr; 16(4):323-8. PubMed ID: 22284228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early experience with endoscopic revision of lumbar spinal fusions.
McGrath LB; Madhavan K; Chieng LO; Wang MY; Hofstetter CP
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Feb; 40(2):E10. PubMed ID: 26828879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Paul AR; Anderson WN; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 21332281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction model for outcome after low-back surgery: individualized likelihood of complication, hospital readmission, return to work, and 12-month improvement in functional disability.
McGirt MJ; Sivaganesan A; Asher AL; Devin CJ
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E13. PubMed ID: 26621411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
