These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

911 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24836659)

  • 21. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
    Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Outcome of decompression with and without fusion in spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis in relation to preoperative pain pattern: a register study of 1,624 patients.
    Sigmundsson FG; Jönsson B; Strömqvist B
    Spine J; 2015 Apr; 15(4):638-46. PubMed ID: 25450653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stability-preserving decompression in degenerative versus congenital spinal stenosis: demographic patterns and patient outcomes.
    Louie PK; Paul JC; Markowitz J; Bell JA; Basques BA; Yacob A; An HS
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1420-1425. PubMed ID: 28456675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance.
    Hikata T; Watanabe K; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Hosogane N; Ishii K; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of hand grip strength on surgical outcomes after surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a preliminary result.
    Shen F; Kim HJ; Lee NK; Chun HJ; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2018-2024. PubMed ID: 29679727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of preoperative depression on 2-year clinical outcomes following adult spinal deformity surgery: the importance of risk stratification based on type of psychological distress.
    Theologis AA; Ailon T; Scheer JK; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Gupta M; Klineberg EO; Kebaish K; Schwab F; Lafage V; Burton D; Hart R; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Oct; 25(4):477-485. PubMed ID: 27153146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comprehensive study of back and leg pain improvements after adult spinal deformity surgery: analysis of 421 patients with 2-year follow-up and of the impact of the surgery on treatment satisfaction.
    Scheer JK; Smith JS; Clark AJ; Lafage V; Kim HJ; Rolston JD; Eastlack R; Hart RA; Protopsaltis TS; Kelly MP; Kebaish K; Gupta M; Klineberg E; Hostin R; Shaffrey CI; Schwab F; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):540-53. PubMed ID: 25700238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predictors of long-term outcome in an elderly group after laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
    Bouras T; Stranjalis G; Loufardaki M; Sourtzis I; Stavrinou LC; Sakas DE
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Sep; 13(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 20809725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Depressive burden in the preoperative and early recovery phase predicts poorer surgery outcome among lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a one-year prospective follow-up study.
    Sinikallio S; Aalto T; Airaksinen O; Herno A; Kröger H; Viinamäki H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2573-8. PubMed ID: 19927107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained of revision neural decompression and instrumented fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the value of surgical intervention.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Feb; 16(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 22054639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.
    den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of catastrophising on treatment outcomes after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Park JW; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Nov; 97-B(11):1546-54. PubMed ID: 26530659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Decompression and nonfusion dynamic stabilization for spinal stenosis with degenerative lumbar scoliosis: Clinical article.
    Lee SE; Jahng TA; Kim HJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):585-94. PubMed ID: 25084033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of pain sensitivity on surgical outcomes after lumbar spine surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Lee JI; Kang KT; Chang BS; Lee CK; Ruscheweyh R; Kang SS; Yeom JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Feb; 40(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 25384051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a comprehensive analysis in 104 patients. Does the cause of deformity influence the outcome?
    Eskilsson K; Sharma D; Johansson C; Hedlund R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jul; 27(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 28475018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Two-year comprehensive medical management of degenerative lumbar spine disease (lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis, or disc herniation): a value analysis of cost, pain, disability, and quality of life: clinical article.
    Parker SL; Godil SS; Mendenhall SK; Zuckerman SL; Shau DN; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 24785973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Step treatment strategy of degenerative lumbar scoliosis and spinal stenosis].
    Zhang Z; Ren D; Sun T; Li F; Guan K; Zhao G; Shan J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 25(8):951-5. PubMed ID: 21923023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.
    Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Pyo SY; Paulo D; Härtl R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 25635635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of best versus worst clinical outcomes for adult spinal deformity surgery: a retrospective review of a prospectively collected, multicenter database with 2-year follow-up.
    Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Lafage V; Schwab F; Scheer JK; Protopsaltis T; Klineberg E; Gupta M; Hostin R; Fu KM; Mundis GM; Kim HJ; Deviren V; Soroceanu A; Hart RA; Burton DC; Bess S; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 26047345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Outcomes of Revision Surgery Following Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Comparative Analysis between Pseudarthrosis and Adjacent Segment Disease.
    Suh SP; Jo YH; Jeong HW; Choi WR; Kang CN
    Asian Spine J; 2017 Jun; 11(3):463-471. PubMed ID: 28670415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 46.