These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24836717)

  • 1. The harder the task, the more inconsistent the performance: a PPT analysis on task difficulty.
    Rice S; Geels K; Hackett HR; Trafimow D; McCarley JS; Schwark J; Hunt G
    J Gen Psychol; 2012; 139(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 24836717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. P3a from visual stimuli: task difficulty effects.
    Hagen GF; Gatherwright JR; Lopez BA; Polich J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 16253363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Potential performance theory (PPT): a general theory of task performance applied to morality.
    Trafimow D; Rice S
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Apr; 115(2):447-62. PubMed ID: 18426298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eye movements reveal how task difficulty moulds visual search.
    Young AH; Hulleman J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):168-90. PubMed ID: 22642215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved intertask coordination after extensive dual-task practice.
    Liepelt R; Strobach T; Frensch P; Schubert T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jul; 64(7):1251-72. PubMed ID: 21462091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using PPT to correct for inconsistency in a speeded task.
    Rice S; Trafimow D; Keller D; Hunt G; Geels K
    J Gen Psychol; 2011; 138(1):12-34. PubMed ID: 21404947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate.
    Kraft A; Müller NG; Hagendorf H; Schira MM; Dick S; Fendrich RM; Brandt SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15922154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Varying task difficulty in the Go/Nogo task: the effects of inhibitory control, arousal, and perceived effort on ERP components.
    Benikos N; Johnstone SJ; Roodenrys SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 22902315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual lobe shape and search performance for targets of different difficulty.
    Chan AH; Tang NY
    Ergonomics; 2007 Feb; 50(2):289-318. PubMed ID: 17419160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bottom-up influences on voluntary task switching: the elusive homunculus escapes.
    Yeung N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):348-62. PubMed ID: 20192535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Classification images for detection, contrast discrimination, and identification tasks with a common ideal observer.
    Abbey CK; Eckstein MP
    J Vis; 2006 Feb; 6(4):335-55. PubMed ID: 16889473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time pressure heuristics can improve performance due to increased consistency.
    Rice S; Trafimow D
    J Gen Psychol; 2012; 139(4):273-88. PubMed ID: 24837178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Equivalency of reaction times for simple and primed tasks.
    Hart MA; Reeve TG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 17055991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonstrategic contributions to putatively strategic effects in selective attention tasks.
    Risko EF; Blais C; Stolz JA; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):1044-52. PubMed ID: 18665744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of the motion and visual complexity of the background on players' performance in video game-like displays.
    Caroux L; Le Bigot L; Vibert N
    Ergonomics; 2013; 56(12):1863-76. PubMed ID: 24168472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A bottom-up model of spatial attention predicts human error patterns in rapid scene recognition.
    Einhäuser W; Mundhenk TN; Baldi P; Koch C; Itti L
    J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):6.1-13. PubMed ID: 17997675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What matters in implicit task sequence learning: perceptual stimulus features, task sets, or correlated streams of information?
    Weiermann B; Cock J; Meier B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1492-509. PubMed ID: 21038998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of memory load on visual search.
    Gil-Gómez de Liaño B; Botella J
    Psicothema; 2010 Nov; 22(4):725-31. PubMed ID: 21044505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task integration in time production.
    Wohldmann EL; Healy AF; Bourne LE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1130-43. PubMed ID: 20436206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual and memory search in complex environments: determinants of eye movements and search performance.
    Huestegge L; Radach R
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(9):1009-27. PubMed ID: 22725621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.