163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24837019)
1. Deciding the fate of others: the cognitive underpinnings of racially biased juror decision making.
Kleider HM; Knuycky LR; Cavrak SE
J Gen Psychol; 2012; 139(3):175-93. PubMed ID: 24837019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Jurors' cognitive depletion and performance during jury deliberation as a function of jury diversity and defendant race.
Peter-Hagene L
Law Hum Behav; 2019 Jun; 43(3):232-249. PubMed ID: 31120276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prejudice and terror management at trial: Effects of defendant race/ethnicity and mortality salience on mock-jurors' verdict judgments.
Leippe MR; Bergold AN; Eisenstadt D
J Soc Psychol; 2017; 157(3):279-294. PubMed ID: 27136391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Race, witness credibility, and jury deliberation in a simulated drug trafficking trial.
Shaw EV; Lynch M; Laguna S; Frenda SJ
Law Hum Behav; 2021 Jun; 45(3):215-228. PubMed ID: 34351204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acquaintance rape: the effect of race of defendant and race of victim on white juror decisions.
Hymes RW; Leinart M; Rowe S; Rogers W
J Soc Psychol; 1993 Oct; 133(5):627-34. PubMed ID: 8283859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Racial bias in jury selection hurts mock jurors, not just defendants: Testing one potential intervention.
Abramowitz K; Douglass AB
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):153-168. PubMed ID: 36931855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Talking about a black man: the influence of defendant and character witness race on jurors' use of character evidence.
Maeder EM; Hunt JS
Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):608-20. PubMed ID: 21796674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Race and jurors' receptivity to mitigation in capital cases: the effect of jurors', defendants', and victims' race in combination.
Brewer TW
Law Hum Behav; 2004 Oct; 28(5):529-45. PubMed ID: 15638208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of social desirability and establishing nonracist credentials on mock juror decisions about Black defendants.
Salerno JM; Kulak K; Smalarz L; Eerdmans RE; Lawrence ML; Dao T
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):100-118. PubMed ID: 36931852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mosaic or Melting Pot? Race and Juror Decision Making in Canada and the United States.
Maeder EM; McManus LA
J Interpers Violence; 2022 Jan; 37(1-2):NP991-NP1012. PubMed ID: 32401133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gender, Generations, and Guilt: Defendant Gender and Age Affect Jurors' Decisions and Perceptions in an Intimate Partner Homicide Trial.
Ruva CL; Smith KD; Sykes EC
J Interpers Violence; 2023 Dec; 38(23-24):12089-12112. PubMed ID: 37602736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Juror sensitivity to the cross-race effect.
Abshire J; Bornstein BH
Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):471-80. PubMed ID: 14593793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of race on jurors' perceptions of lethal police use of force.
Ewanation L; Maeder EM
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 36931849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of defendant race, victim race, and juror gender on evidence processing in a murder trial.
Forsterlee R; Forsterlee L; Horowitz IA; King E
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):179-98. PubMed ID: 16557616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of defendant race and mental disorder type on mock juror decision-making in insanity trials.
Maeder EM; Yamamoto S; McLaughlin KJ
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 68():101536. PubMed ID: 32033700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Waiving goodbye to youth: Jurors perceive transferred juveniles differently from adults but render similar verdicts.
Katzman J; Fessinger MB; Bornstein BH; McWilliams K
Behav Sci Law; 2022 Nov; 40(6):835-858. PubMed ID: 36226574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can jurors be biased in their evaluation of third-party evidence within cases of rape?
Parsons A; Mojtahedi D
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 85():101837. PubMed ID: 36122514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mock-Jurors' Judgements in a Sexual Assault Case: The Influence of Defendant Race and Occupational Status, Delayed Reporting, and Multiple Allegations.
Fraser BM; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
J Interpers Violence; 2023 Jul; 38(13-14):7964-7989. PubMed ID: 36762531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
