These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24837019)

  • 21. Racial bias in mock juror decision-making: a meta-analytic review of defendant treatment.
    Mitchell TL; Haw RM; Pfeifer JE; Meissner CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Dec; 29(6):621-37. PubMed ID: 16382353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Discrimination and instructional comprehension: guided discretion, racial bias, and the death penalty.
    Lynch M; Haney C
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Jun; 24(3):337-58. PubMed ID: 10846376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. White mock jurors' moral emotional responses to viewing female victim photographs depend on the victim's race.
    Phalen HJ; Salerno JM; Adamoli M; Nadler J
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Dec; 47(6):666-685. PubMed ID: 38127550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors.
    Carlson KA; Russo JE
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Jun; 7(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 11477983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is all prejudice created equal? The role of modern and aversive racism in mock juror decisions.
    Estrada-Reynolds V; Freng S; Schweitzer K; Leki EL
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2023; 30(5):579-599. PubMed ID: 37744645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of defense-only and opposing eyewitness experts on juror judgments.
    Devenport JL; Cutler BL
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Oct; 28(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 15638210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attitudinal Predictors of Juror Decisions on Gender and Sexual Minority Defendants.
    Ringger CS
    J Homosex; 2021 Oct; 68(12):2047-2074. PubMed ID: 32069192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How reason for surgery and patient weight affect verdicts and perceptions in medical malpractice trials: a comparison of students and jurors.
    Reichert J; Miller MK; Bornstein BH; Shelton HD
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):395-418. PubMed ID: 21308752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. "Race salience" in juror decision-making: misconceptions, clarifications, and unanswered questions.
    Sommers SR; Ellsworth PC
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(4):599-609. PubMed ID: 19513991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Sexual Assault on a University Campus.
    Pica E; Sheahan CL; Pozzulo J
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 May; 36(9-10):NP5447-NP5465. PubMed ID: 30239260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Are consistent juror decisions related to fast and frugal decision making? Investigating the relationship between juror consistency, decision speed and cue utilisation.
    Curley LJ; Murray J; MacLean R; Laybourn P
    Med Sci Law; 2017 Oct; 57(4):211-219. PubMed ID: 28992745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The impact of pretrial publicity on mock juror and jury verdicts: A meta-analysis.
    Hoetger LA; Devine DJ; Brank EM; Drew RM; Rees R
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):121-139. PubMed ID: 35084906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Saving damsels, sentencing deviants and selective chivalry decisions: juror decision-making in an ambiguous assault case.
    Meaux LT; Cox J; Kopkin MR
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(5):724-736. PubMed ID: 31984048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Possibility of death sentence has divergent effect on verdicts for Black and White defendants.
    Glaser J; Martin KD; Kahn KB
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Dec; 39(6):539-46. PubMed ID: 26146816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of sex on mock jurors' verdicts across type of child abuse cases.
    Pettalia J; Pozzulo JD; Reed J
    Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Jul; 69():1-9. PubMed ID: 28415027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Town vs. gown: a direct comparison of community residents and student mock jurors.
    Hosch HM; Culhane SE; Tubb VA; Granillo EA
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):452-66. PubMed ID: 21351133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimating juror accuracy, juror ability, and the relationship between them.
    Park K
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):288-305. PubMed ID: 20658261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Juror perceptions of the stereotypical violent crime defendant.
    Sorby M; Kehn A
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(5):645-664. PubMed ID: 35571602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Canadian mock juror attitudes and decisions in domestic violence cases involving asian and white interracial and intraracial couples.
    Maeder EM; Mossière A; Cheung L
    J Interpers Violence; 2013 Mar; 28(4):667-84. PubMed ID: 22929345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.