These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24837599)

  • 1. The handicap process favors exaggerated, rather than reduced, sexual ornaments.
    Tazzyman SJ; Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 2014 Sep; 68(9):2534-49. PubMed ID: 24837599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Signaling efficacy drives the evolution of larger sexual ornaments by sexual selection.
    Tazzyman SJ; Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 2014 Jan; 68(1):216-29. PubMed ID: 24099137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term persistence of exaggerated ornaments under Fisherian runaway despite costly mate search.
    Waffender A; Henshaw JM
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 36514848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sexual selection on multiple female ornaments in dance flies.
    Murray RL; Wheeler J; Gwynne DT; Bussière LF
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Sep; 285(1887):. PubMed ID: 30232158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Handicap principle implies emergence of dimorphic ornaments.
    Clifton SM; Braun RI; Abrams DM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Nov; 283(1843):. PubMed ID: 27903876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Uninformative exaggeration of male sexual ornaments in barn swallows.
    Bro-Jørgensen J; Johnstone RA; Evans MR
    Curr Biol; 2007 May; 17(10):850-5. PubMed ID: 17412591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. THE EVOLUTION OF MATE PREFERENCES FOR MULTIPLE SEXUAL ORNAMENTS.
    Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 1994 Jun; 48(3):853-867. PubMed ID: 28568273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evolution of mating preferences for genetic attractiveness and quality in the presence of sensory bias.
    Henshaw JM; Fromhage L; Jones AG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(33):e2206262119. PubMed ID: 35939704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Male sexual ornament size is positively associated with reproductive morphology and enhanced fertility in the stalk-eyed fly Teleopsis dalmanni.
    Rogers DW; Denniff M; Chapman T; Fowler K; Pomiankowski A
    BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Aug; 8():236. PubMed ID: 18710553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evolution of female ornaments and weaponry: social selection, sexual selection and ecological competition.
    Tobias JA; Montgomerie R; Lyon BE
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2012 Aug; 367(1600):2274-93. PubMed ID: 22777016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparative Study of the Role of Sex-Specific Condition Dependence in the Evolution of Sexually Dimorphic Traits.
    Rohner PT; Blanckenhorn WU
    Am Nat; 2018 Dec; 192(6):E202-E215. PubMed ID: 30444660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mate sampling influences the intensity of sexual selection and the evolution of costly sexual ornaments.
    Muniz DG; Machado G
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 447():74-83. PubMed ID: 29567325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental evidence that female ornamentation increases the acquisition of sperm and signals fecundity.
    Cornwallis CK; Birkhead TR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Feb; 274(1609):583-90. PubMed ID: 17476780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexual selection and condition-dependence.
    Johnstone RA; Rands SA; Evans MR
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Dec; 22(12):2387-94. PubMed ID: 19874439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The sexual selection paradigm: have we overlooked other mechanisms in the evolution of male ornaments?
    Candolin U; Tukiainen I
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Oct; 282(1816):20151987. PubMed ID: 26446811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The costs of choice in sexual selection.
    Pomiankowski A
    J Theor Biol; 1987 Sep; 128(2):195-218. PubMed ID: 3431135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No fecundity cost of female secondary sexual trait expression in the horned beetle Onthophagus sagittarius.
    Simmons LW; Emlen DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1227-35. PubMed ID: 18631210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Condition-dependence and sexual ornamentation: Effects of immune challenges on a highly sexually dimorphic grasshopper.
    Valverde JP; Eggert H; Kurtz J; Schielzeth H
    Insect Sci; 2018 Aug; 25(4):617-630. PubMed ID: 28229542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How sexual selection can drive the evolution of costly sperm ornamentation.
    Lüpold S; Manier MK; Puniamoorthy N; Schoff C; Starmer WT; Luepold SH; Belote JM; Pitnick S
    Nature; 2016 May; 533(7604):535-8. PubMed ID: 27225128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the origins of sexual dimorphism in butterflies.
    Oliver JC; Monteiro A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Jul; 278(1714):1981-8. PubMed ID: 21123259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.