These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24837819)

  • 1. Differences between young and old university students on a lexical decision task: evidence through an ex-Gaussian approach.
    Navarro-Pardo E; Navarro-Prados AB; Gamermann D; Moret-Tatay C
    J Gen Psychol; 2013; 140(4):251-68. PubMed ID: 24837819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is the go/no-go lexical decision task preferable to the yes/no task with developing readers?
    Moret-Tatay C; Perea M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Sep; 110(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 21565360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task?
    Perea M; Rosa E; Gómez C
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 11958353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Additive and interactive effects in semantic priming: Isolating lexical and decision processes in the lexical decision task.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA; Tan SE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):140-58. PubMed ID: 22612169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advantage of the go/no-go task over the yes/no lexical decision task: ERP indexes of parameters in the diffusion model.
    Lee H; Lee Y; Tae J; Kwon Y
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0218451. PubMed ID: 31260472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primed lexical decision task in fearful and nonfearful individuals.
    Christopherson KM; Ferraro FR
    J Psychol; 2009 May; 143(3):267-78. PubMed ID: 19455855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Syllable priming with pseudowords in the lexical decision task.
    Mathey S; Doignon-Camus N; Chetail F
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Sep; 67(3):205-14. PubMed ID: 23914749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is lexical access autonomous? Evidence from combining overlapping tasks with recording event-related brain potentials.
    Rabovsky M; Alvarez CJ; Hohlfeld A; Sommer W
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1222():156-65. PubMed ID: 18585684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modulation of additive and interactive effects in lexical decision by trial history.
    Masson ME; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):898-914. PubMed ID: 22774856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. You can't Stroop a lexical decision: is semantic processing fundamentally facilitative?
    Schmidt JR; Cheesman J; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Jun; 67(2):130-9. PubMed ID: 23205510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
    Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing.
    McCann RS; Remington RW; Van Selst M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Aug; 26(4):1352-70. PubMed ID: 10946719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Divided attention can enhance memory encoding: the attentional boost effect in implicit memory.
    Spataro P; Mulligan NW; Rossi-Arnaud C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1223-31. PubMed ID: 23356238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of incidental hints when problems are suspended before, during, or after an impasse.
    Moss J; Kotovsky K; Cagan J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):140-8. PubMed ID: 20854010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The processing advantage and disadvantage for homophones in lexical decision tasks.
    Hino Y; Kusunose Y; Lupker SJ; Jared D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):529-51. PubMed ID: 22905930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lexical decision in children: sublexical processing or lexical search?
    van den Boer M; de Jong PF; Haentjens-van Meeteren MM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1214-28. PubMed ID: 22489669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A diffusion model account of normal and impaired readers.
    Ratcliff R; Perea M; Colangelo A; Buchanan L
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):374-82. PubMed ID: 15177817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Across-task priming revisited: response and task conflicts disentangled using ex-Gaussian distribution analysis.
    Moutsopoulou K; Waszak F
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):367-74. PubMed ID: 22004198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is retrieval mediated after repeated testing?
    Kole JA; Healy AF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):462-72. PubMed ID: 22686841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.