These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24838190)

  • 41. Aligning sentence structures in dialogue: evidence from aphasia.
    Lee J; Man G; Ferreira V; Gruberg N
    Lang Cogn Neurosci; 2019; 34(6):720-735. PubMed ID: 31815155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Sentence planning following traumatic brain injury.
    Ellis C; Peach RK
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2009; 24(3):255-66. PubMed ID: 19458433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Syntactic priming in German-English bilinguals during sentence comprehension.
    Weber K; Indefrey P
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jul; 46(4):1164-72. PubMed ID: 19328233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Structural priming is determined by global syntax rather than internal phrasal structure: Evidence from young and older adults.
    Hardy SM; Wheeldon L; Segaert K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):720-740. PubMed ID: 31545625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming?
    Bernolet S; Hartsuiker RJ
    Cognition; 2010 Mar; 114(3):455-61. PubMed ID: 20034624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Age-related influences on lexical selection and orthographic encoding during homophone spelling.
    White KK; Abrams L; Palm GM; Protasi MA
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Mar; 27(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 21787089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Testing for lexical competition during reading: fast priming with orthographic neighbors.
    Nakayama M; Sears CR; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):477-92. PubMed ID: 20364931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Incrementality in Planning of Speech During Speaking and Reading Aloud: Evidence from Eye-Tracking.
    Ganushchak LY; Chen Y
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():33. PubMed ID: 26858678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Syntactic persistence in Dutch.
    Hartsuiker RJ; Kolk HH
    Lang Speech; 1998; 41 ( Pt 2)():143-84. PubMed ID: 10194875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Concurrent speech planning does not eliminate repetition priming from spoken words: Evidence from linguistic dual-tasking.
    Bartolozzi F; Jongman SR; Meyer AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Mar; 47(3):466-480. PubMed ID: 33030939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Being forward not backward: lexical limits to masked priming.
    Davis C; Kim J; Forster KI
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):673-84. PubMed ID: 17765887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Accessibility of Referent Information Influences Sentence Planning: An Eye-Tracking Study.
    Ganushchak LY; Konopka AE; Chen Y
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():250. PubMed ID: 28293201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Speeded verbal responding in adults who stutter: are there deficits in linguistic encoding?
    Hennessey NW; Nang CY; Beilby JM
    J Fluency Disord; 2008 Sep; 33(3):180-202. PubMed ID: 18762061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Grammatical Encoding and Learning in Agrammatic Aphasia: Evidence from Structural Priming.
    Cho-Reyes S; Mack JE; Thompson CK
    J Mem Lang; 2016 Dec; 91():202-218. PubMed ID: 28924328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. When English proposes what Greek presupposes: the cross-linguistic encoding of motion events.
    Papafragou A; Massey C; Gleitman L
    Cognition; 2006 Jan; 98(3):B75-87. PubMed ID: 16043167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Who's in control? Proficiency and L1 influence on L2 processing.
    Elston-Güttler KE; Paulmann S; Kotz SA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 17(10):1593-610. PubMed ID: 16269099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Linguistic processes in the two cerebral hemispheres: implications for modularity vs interactionism.
    Faust M; Babkoff H; Kravetz S
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 Apr; 17(2):171-92. PubMed ID: 7629266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Zhou X; Jiang X; Ye Z; Zhang Y; Lou K; Zhan W
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1551-62. PubMed ID: 20138898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: for the speaker or for the addressee?
    Kraljic T; Brennan SE
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Mar; 50(2):194-231. PubMed ID: 15680144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension.
    Farmer TA; Christiansen MH; Monaghan P
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Aug; 103(32):12203-8. PubMed ID: 16882728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.