These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24838331)

  • 1. Clinical validation of KRAS, BRAF, and EGFR mutation detection using next-generation sequencing.
    Lin MT; Mosier SL; Thiess M; Beierl KF; Debeljak M; Tseng LH; Chen G; Yegnasubramanian S; Ho H; Cope L; Wheelan SJ; Gocke CD; Eshleman JR
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2014 Jun; 141(6):856-66. PubMed ID: 24838331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of amplicon-based next generation DNA sequencing for diagnostic gene mutation profiling in oncopathology.
    Sie D; Snijders PJ; Meijer GA; Doeleman MW; van Moorsel MI; van Essen HF; Eijk PP; Grünberg K; van Grieken NC; Thunnissen E; Verheul HM; Smit EF; Ylstra B; Heideman DA
    Cell Oncol (Dordr); 2014 Oct; 37(5):353-61. PubMed ID: 25209392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) and real-time PCR in the detection of EGFR, KRAS, and BRAF mutations on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor material of non-small cell lung carcinoma-superiority of NGS.
    Tuononen K; Mäki-Nevala S; Sarhadi VK; Wirtanen A; Rönty M; Salmenkivi K; Andrews JM; Telaranta-Keerie AI; Hannula S; Lagström S; Ellonen P; Knuuttila A; Knuutila S
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2013 May; 52(5):503-11. PubMed ID: 23362162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical pharmacogenomic testing of KRAS, BRAF and EGFR mutations by high resolution melting analysis and ultra-deep pyrosequencing.
    Borràs E; Jurado I; Hernan I; Gamundi MJ; Dias M; Martí I; Mañé B; Arcusa A; Agúndez JA; Blanca M; Carballo M
    BMC Cancer; 2011 Sep; 11():406. PubMed ID: 21943394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Next generation MUT-MAP, a high-sensitivity high-throughput microfluidics chip-based mutation analysis panel.
    Schleifman EB; Tam R; Patel R; Tsan A; Sumiyoshi T; Fu L; Desai R; Schoenbrunner N; Myers TW; Bauer K; Smith E; Raja R
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e90761. PubMed ID: 24658394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of next generation sequencing technologies in comparison to current diagnostic gold standards for BRAF, EGFR and KRAS mutational analysis.
    McCourt CM; McArt DG; Mills K; Catherwood MA; Maxwell P; Waugh DJ; Hamilton P; O'Sullivan JM; Salto-Tellez M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e69604. PubMed ID: 23922754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiplatform comparison of molecular oncology tests performed on cytology specimens and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue.
    Gailey MP; Stence AA; Jensen CS; Ma D
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Jan; 123(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 25186473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Next-generation sequencing analysis of lung and colon carcinomas reveals a variety of genetic alterations.
    Chevrier S; Arnould L; Ghiringhelli F; Coudert B; Fumoleau P; Boidot R
    Int J Oncol; 2014 Sep; 45(3):1167-74. PubMed ID: 24990411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. KRAS and BRAF mutation analysis in routine molecular diagnostics: comparison of three testing methods on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor-derived DNA.
    Heideman DA; Lurkin I; Doeleman M; Smit EF; Verheul HM; Meijer GA; Snijders PJ; Thunnissen E; Zwarthoff EC
    J Mol Diagn; 2012; 14(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 22425762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High resolution melting analysis for rapid and sensitive EGFR and KRAS mutation detection in formalin fixed paraffin embedded biopsies.
    Do H; Krypuy M; Mitchell PL; Fox SB; Dobrovic A
    BMC Cancer; 2008 May; 8():142. PubMed ID: 18495026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid clinical mutational testing of
    Van Haele M; Vander Borght S; Ceulemans A; Wieërs M; Metsu S; Sagaert X; Weynand B
    J Clin Pathol; 2020 Jan; 73(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 31296605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consistency and reproducibility of next-generation sequencing in cytopathology: A second worldwide ring trial study on improved cytological molecular reference specimens.
    Pisapia P; Malapelle U; Roma G; Saddar S; Zheng Q; Pepe F; Bruzzese D; Vigliar E; Bellevicine C; Luthra R; Nikiforov YE; Mayo-de-Las-Casas C; Molina-Vila MA; Rosell R; Bihl M; Savic S; Bubendorf L; de Biase D; Tallini G; Hwang DH; Sholl LM; Vander Borght S; Weynand B; Stieber D; Vielh P; Rappa A; Barberis M; Fassan M; Rugge M; De Andrea CE; Lozano MD; Lupi C; Fontanini G; Schmitt F; Dumur CI; Bisig B; Bongiovanni M; Merkelbach-Bruse S; Büttner R; Nikiforova MN; Roy-Chowdhuri S; Troncone G;
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2019 May; 127(5):285-296. PubMed ID: 31021538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reporting tumor molecular heterogeneity in histopathological diagnosis.
    Mafficini A; Amato E; Fassan M; Simbolo M; Antonello D; Vicentini C; Scardoni M; Bersani S; Gottardi M; Rusev B; Malpeli G; Corbo V; Barbi S; Sikora KO; Lawlor RT; Tortora G; Scarpa A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e104979. PubMed ID: 25127237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Construction of a reference material panel for detecting
    Xu J; Qu S; Sun N; Zhang W; Zhang J; Song Q; Lin M; Gao W; Zheng Q; Han M; Na C; Xu R; Chang X; Yang X; Huang J
    J Clin Pathol; 2021 May; 74(5):314-320. PubMed ID: 32817175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. KRAS and BRAF mutation analysis in colorectal adenocarcinoma specimens with a low percentage of tumor cells.
    Lewandowska MA; Jóźwicki W; Żurawski B
    Mol Diagn Ther; 2013 Jun; 17(3):193-203. PubMed ID: 23606169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Methods Show Superior or Equivalent Performance to Non-NGS Methods on
    Surrey LF; Oakley FD; Merker JD; Long TA; Vasalos P; Moncur JT; Kim AS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2019 Aug; 143(8):980-984. PubMed ID: 30865489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of next-generation sequencing and mutation-specific platforms in clinical practice.
    Hinrichs JW; van Blokland WT; Moons MJ; Radersma RD; Radersma-van Loon JH; de Voijs CM; Rappel SB; Koudijs MJ; Besselink NJ; Willems SM; de Weger RA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2015 Apr; 143(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 25780010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing, Quantitative PCR, and Sanger Sequencing for Mutation Profiling of EGFR, KRAS, PIK3CA and BRAF in Clinical Lung Tumors.
    Gao J; Wu H; Shi X; Huo Z; Zhang J; Liang Z
    Clin Lab; 2016; 62(4):689-96. PubMed ID: 27215089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Significant Improvement in Detecting BRAF, KRAS, and EGFR Mutations Using Next-Generation Sequencing as Compared with FDA-Cleared Kits.
    Ma W; Brodie S; Agersborg S; Funari VA; Albitar M
    Mol Diagn Ther; 2017 Oct; 21(5):571-579. PubMed ID: 28639239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noninvasive diagnosis of actionable mutations by deep sequencing of circulating free DNA in lung cancer from never-smokers: a proof-of-concept study from BioCAST/IFCT-1002.
    Couraud S; Vaca-Paniagua F; Villar S; Oliver J; Schuster T; Blanché H; Girard N; Trédaniel J; Guilleminault L; Gervais R; Prim N; Vincent M; Margery J; Larivé S; Foucher P; Duvert B; Vallee M; Le Calvez-Kelm F; McKay J; Missy P; Morin F; Zalcman G; Olivier M; Souquet PJ;
    Clin Cancer Res; 2014 Sep; 20(17):4613-24. PubMed ID: 25013125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.