These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24839728)

  • 1. Developmental trends in the process of constructing own- and other-race facial composites.
    Kehn A; Renken MD; Gray JM; Nunez NL
    J Psychol; 2014; 148(3):287-304. PubMed ID: 24839728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The development of memory for own- and other-race faces.
    Goodman GS; Sayfan L; Lee JS; Sandhei M; Walle-Olsen A; Magnussen S; Pezdek K; Arredondo P
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Dec; 98(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17928001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Externalizing visual images: examining the accuracy of facial descriptions vs. composites as a function of the own-race bias.
    McQuiston-Surrett D; Topp LD
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 18549167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the influence of recollection and familiarity in memory for own- versus other-race faces.
    Marcon JL; Susa KJ; Meissner CA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 19145017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Face-blind for other-race faces: Individual differences in other-race recognition impairments.
    Wan L; Crookes K; Dawel A; Pidcock M; Hall A; McKone E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Jan; 146(1):102-122. PubMed ID: 27893239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring the diagnostic utility of facial composites: beliefs of guilt can bias perceived similarity between composite and suspect.
    Charman SD; Gregory AH; Carlucci M
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):76-90. PubMed ID: 19309218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Organizational Strategies Partially Account for Race-related Differences in List Recall Performance.
    Fox ME; Panwala TF; King TZ
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2019 Feb; 34(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 29474511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distinctiveness is in the eye of the beholder: cross-racial differences in perceptions of faces.
    Van Wallendael LR; Kuhn JC
    Psychol Rep; 1997 Feb; 80(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 9122349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relative salience of sex, race, age, and glasses in children's social perception.
    McGraw KO; Durm MW; Durnam MR
    J Genet Psychol; 1989 Sep; 150(3):251-67. PubMed ID: 2809573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Knowing your face: A componential analysis of self-perceived facial attractiveness.
    Yoder MS; Ault LK; Mathews MA
    J Soc Psychol; 2017; 157(3):366-381. PubMed ID: 27700909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Culture, gender, and the first memories of black and white American students.
    Fitzgerald JM
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Sep; 38(6):785-96. PubMed ID: 20852241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Amygdala sensitivity to race is not present in childhood but emerges over adolescence.
    Telzer EH; Humphreys KL; Shapiro M; Tottenham N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Feb; 25(2):234-44. PubMed ID: 23066731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Young children's automatic encoding of social categories.
    Weisman K; Johnson MV; Shutts K
    Dev Sci; 2015 Nov; 18(6):1036-43. PubMed ID: 25483012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How race and age experiences shape young children's face processing abilities.
    Macchi Cassia V; Luo L; Pisacane A; Li H; Lee K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Apr; 120():87-101. PubMed ID: 24398416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facial emotion recognition among typically developing young children: A psychometric validation of a subset of NimStim stimuli.
    Barnard-Brak L; Abby L; Richman DM; Chesnut S
    Psychiatry Res; 2017 Mar; 249():109-114. PubMed ID: 28092789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cross-race (but not same-race) face identification is impaired by presenting faces in a group rather than individually.
    Pezdek K; O'Brien M; Wasson C
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Dec; 36(6):488-95. PubMed ID: 23205596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-age effects on forensic face construction.
    Fodarella C; Brown C; Lewis A; Frowd CD
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1237. PubMed ID: 26347697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attractiveness of own-race, other-race, and mixed-race faces.
    Rhodes G; Lee K; Palermo R; Weiss M; Yoshikawa S; Clissa P; Williams T; Peters M; Winkler C; Jeffery L
    Perception; 2005; 34(3):319-40. PubMed ID: 15895630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Demographic influences on free and cued selective reminding performance in older persons.
    Grober E; Lipton RB; Katz M; Sliwinski M
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1998 Apr; 20(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 9777476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The cross-race effect in face recognition memory by bicultural individuals.
    Marsh BU; Pezdek K; Ozery DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():38-44. PubMed ID: 27219532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.