BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24840300)

  • 21. Lower-pole stones: do we finally have more answers than questions?
    Patterson JM; Rukin NJ
    Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):617-8. PubMed ID: 25435265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contemporary ureteroscopic management of renal stones.
    Proietti S; Knoll T; Giusti G
    Int J Surg; 2016 Dec; 36(Pt D):681-687. PubMed ID: 27913238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Treatment of small lower pole calculi--SWL vs. URS vs. PNL?
    Knoll T; Tasca A; Buchholz NP
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Mar; 83(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 21585161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Re: Sener et al.: asymptomatic lower pole small renal stones: shock wave lithotripsy, flexible ureteroscopy, or observation? A prospective randomized trial (Urology 2015;85:33-37).
    Karatag T; Buldu I; Istanbulluoglu MO
    Urology; 2015 Mar; 85(3):709. PubMed ID: 25733297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
    Yuri P; Hariwibowo R; Soeroharjo I; Danarto R; Hendri AZ; Brodjonegoro SR; Rasyid N; Birowo P; Widyahening IS
    Acta Med Indones; 2018 Jan; 50(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 29686172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower calyceal stones: can clearance be predicted?
    Sabnis RB; Naik K; Patel SH; Desai MR; Bapat SD
    Br J Urol; 1997 Dec; 80(6):853-7. PubMed ID: 9439396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Re: comparative effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treating patients with kidney stones.
    Denstedt J; Welk B
    Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):540. PubMed ID: 26282357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Controversy on lower pole stones: monitor or intervene?].
    Häcker A; Michel MS
    Urologe A; 2012 Mar; 51(3):368-71. PubMed ID: 22350016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Management of Calyceal Diverticular Calculi.
    Yang H; Yao X; Tang C; Shan Y; Weng G
    Urol J; 2019 Feb; 16(1):12-15. PubMed ID: 30066330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones.
    Breda A; Ogunyemi O; Leppert JT; Schulam PG
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1190-6. PubMed ID: 18571315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Asymptomatic lower pole small renal stones: shock wave lithotripsy, flexible ureteroscopy, or observation? A prospective randomized trial.
    Sener NC; Bas O; Sener E; Zengin K; Ozturk U; Altunkol A; Evliyaoglu Y
    Urology; 2015 Jan; 85(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 25440816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Tailored minimally invasive management of complex calculi in horseshoe kidney.
    Ding J; Zhang Y; Cao Q; Huang T; Xu W; Huang K; Fang J; Bai Q; Qi J; Huang Y
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(5):601-10. PubMed ID: 26409427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Treatment selection for urolithiasis: percutaneous nephrolithomy, ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, and active monitoring.
    Desai M; Sun Y; Buchholz N; Fuller A; Matsuda T; Matlaga B; Miller N; Bolton D; Alomar M; Ganpule A
    World J Urol; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1395-1399. PubMed ID: 28303335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Renal Stone Features Are More Important Than Renal Anatomy to Predict Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes: Results from a Prospective Study with CT Follow-Up.
    Torricelli FCM; Monga M; Yamauchi FI; Marchini GS; Danilovic A; Vicentini FC; Batagello CA; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
    J Endourol; 2020 Jan; 34(1):63-67. PubMed ID: 31595801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy.
    Elbahnasy AM; Shalhav AL; Hoenig DM; Elashry OM; Smith DS; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):676-82. PubMed ID: 9474124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Minimally invasive surgical treatment for kidney stone disease.
    Rodríguez D; Sacco DE
    Adv Chronic Kidney Dis; 2015 Jul; 22(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 26088070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lower pole midsize (1-2 cm) calyceal stones: outcome analysis of 56 cases.
    Aboutaleb H; El-Shazly M; Badr Eldin M
    Urol Int; 2012; 89(3):348-54. PubMed ID: 22922771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Management of simultaneous renal and ureteral calculi: combined extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy under a single anesthetic.
    Jarowenko MV; Belis JA; Rohner TJ
    J Urol; 1989 Nov; 142(5):1186-8. PubMed ID: 2810488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of shockwave lithotripsy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of kidney stones in patients with a solitary kidney.
    Yuruk E; Binbay M; Ozgor F; Sekerel L; Berberoglu Y; Muslumanoglu AY
    J Endourol; 2015 Apr; 29(4):463-7. PubMed ID: 25268731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Retrograde intrarenal lithotripsy outcome after failure of shock wave lithotripsy.
    Stav K; Cooper A; Zisman A; Leibovici D; Lindner A; Siegel YI
    J Urol; 2003 Dec; 170(6 Pt 1):2198-201. PubMed ID: 14634378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.