364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24840560)
1. Imputation of ungenotyped parental genotypes in dairy and beef cattle from progeny genotypes.
Berry DP; McParland S; Kearney JF; Sargolzaei M; Mullen MP
Animal; 2014 Jun; 8(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 24840560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of developed low-density genotype panels for imputation to higher density in independent dairy and beef cattle populations.
Judge MM; Kearney JF; McClure MC; Sleator RD; Berry DP
J Anim Sci; 2016 Mar; 94(3):949-62. PubMed ID: 27065257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imputation of non-genotyped sheep from the genotypes of their mates and resulting progeny.
Berry DP; McHugh N; Randles S; Wall E; McDermott K; Sargolzaei M; O'Brien AC
Animal; 2018 Feb; 12(2):191-198. PubMed ID: 28712375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Within- and across-breed imputation of high-density genotypes in dairy and beef cattle from medium- and low-density genotypes.
Berry DP; McClure MC; Mullen MP
J Anim Breed Genet; 2014 Jun; 131(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 24906026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of genome-wide imputation in Braford and Hereford beef cattle.
Piccoli ML; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Larmer SG; Schenkel FS
BMC Genet; 2014 Dec; 15():157. PubMed ID: 25543517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of reducing the frequency of animals genotyped at higher density on imputation and prediction accuracies using ssGBLUP1.
Sollero BP; Howard JT; Spangler ML
J Anim Sci; 2019 Jul; 97(7):2780-2792. PubMed ID: 31115442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Concordance rate between copy number variants detected using either high- or medium-density single nucleotide polymorphism genotype panels and the potential of imputing copy number variants from flanking high density single nucleotide polymorphism haplotypes in cattle.
Rafter P; Gormley IC; Parnell AC; Kearney JF; Berry DP
BMC Genomics; 2020 Mar; 21(1):205. PubMed ID: 32131735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A mating advice system in dairy cattle incorporating genomic information.
Carthy TR; McCarthy J; Berry DP
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8210-8220. PubMed ID: 31229287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Strategies for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping to enhance genotype imputation in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle: Comparison of commercially available SNP chips.
Boison SA; Santos DJ; Utsunomiya AH; Carvalheiro R; Neves HH; O'Brien AM; Garcia JF; Sölkner J; da Silva MV
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4969-89. PubMed ID: 25958293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Imputation of genotypes from low density (50,000 markers) to high density (700,000 markers) of cows from research herds in Europe, North America, and Australasia using 2 reference populations.
Pryce JE; Johnston J; Hayes BJ; Sahana G; Weigel KA; McParland S; Spurlock D; Krattenmacher N; Spelman RJ; Wall E; Calus MP
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1799-811. PubMed ID: 24472132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High imputation accuracy from informative low-to-medium density single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes is achievable in sheep1.
O'Brien AC; Judge MM; Fair S; Berry DP
J Anim Sci; 2019 Apr; 97(4):1550-1567. PubMed ID: 30722011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Strategies and utility of imputed SNP genotypes for genomic analysis in dairy cattle.
Khatkar MS; Moser G; Hayes BJ; Raadsma HW
BMC Genomics; 2012 Oct; 13():538. PubMed ID: 23043356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The feasibility of using low-density marker panels for genotype imputation and genomic prediction of crossbred dairy cattle of East Africa.
Aliloo H; Mrode R; Okeyo AM; Ni G; Goddard ME; Gibson JP
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Oct; 101(10):9108-9127. PubMed ID: 30077450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds.
Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Kijas JW; van der Werf JH
Anim Genet; 2012 Feb; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22221027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Justification for setting the individual animal genotype call rate threshold at eighty-five percent.
Purfield DC; McClure M; Berry DP
J Anim Sci; 2016 Nov; 94(11):4558-4569. PubMed ID: 27898963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Strategies for genotype imputation in composite beef cattle.
Chud TC; Ventura RV; Schenkel FS; Carvalheiro R; Buzanskas ME; Rosa JO; Mudadu Mde A; da Silva MV; Mokry FB; Marcondes CR; Regitano LC; Munari DP
BMC Genet; 2015 Aug; 16():99. PubMed ID: 26250698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-density marker imputation accuracy in sixteen French cattle breeds.
Hozé C; Fouilloux MN; Venot E; Guillaume F; Dassonneville R; Fritz S; Ducrocq V; Phocas F; Boichard D; Croiseau P
Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Sep; 45(1):33. PubMed ID: 24004563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extent of linkage disequilibrium, consistency of gametic phase, and imputation accuracy within and across Canadian dairy breeds.
Larmer SG; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2014 May; 97(5):3128-41. PubMed ID: 24582440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison among three variant callers and assessment of the accuracy of imputation from SNP array data to whole-genome sequence level in chicken.
Ni G; Strom TM; Pausch H; Reimer C; Preisinger R; Simianer H; Erbe M
BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct; 16():824. PubMed ID: 26486989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genotype imputation in a tropical crossbred dairy cattle population.
Oliveira Júnior GA; Chud TCS; Ventura RV; Garrick DJ; Cole JB; Munari DP; Ferraz JBS; Mullart E; DeNise S; Smith S; da Silva MVGB
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Dec; 100(12):9623-9634. PubMed ID: 28987572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
