These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24841444)

  • 1. Parameters affecting genome simulation for evaluating genomic selection method.
    Nishio M; Satoh M
    Anim Sci J; 2014 Oct; 85(10):879-87. PubMed ID: 24841444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of QTL minor allele frequency on genomic evaluation using real genotype data and simulated phenotypes in Japanese Black cattle.
    Uemoto Y; Sasaki S; Kojima T; Sugimoto Y; Watanabe T
    BMC Genet; 2015 Nov; 16():134. PubMed ID: 26586567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contributions of linkage disequilibrium and co-segregation information to the accuracy of genomic prediction.
    Sun X; Fernando R; Dekkers J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Oct; 48(1):77. PubMed ID: 27729012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values.
    Habier D; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC
    Genetics; 2007 Dec; 177(4):2389-97. PubMed ID: 18073436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.
    Muir WM
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic BLUP decoded: a look into the black box of genomic prediction.
    Habier D; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genetics; 2013 Jul; 194(3):597-607. PubMed ID: 23640517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term impacts of genome-enabled selection.
    Long N; Gianola D; Rosa GJ; Weigel KA
    J Appl Genet; 2011 Nov; 52(4):467-80. PubMed ID: 21584728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short communication: Characterization of the genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in 2 divergent selection lines of dairy cows.
    Banos G; Coffey MP
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Jun; 93(6):2775-8. PubMed ID: 20494187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method reflecting the degree of linkage disequilibrium.
    Nishio M; Satoh M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Oct; 132(5):357-65. PubMed ID: 25866073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extent of linkage disequilibrium in Holstein cattle in North America.
    Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS; Jansen GB; Schaeffer LR
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 May; 91(5):2106-17. PubMed ID: 18420642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Components of the accuracy of genomic prediction in a multi-breed sheep population.
    Daetwyler HD; Kemper KE; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Oct; 90(10):3375-84. PubMed ID: 23038744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of genomic selection in simulated populations mimicking the extent of linkage disequilibrium in beef cattle.
    Brito FV; Neto JB; Sargolzaei M; Cobuci JA; Schenkel FS
    BMC Genet; 2011 Sep; 12():80. PubMed ID: 21933416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
    Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding and predicting complex traits: knowledge from cattle.
    Kemper KE; Goddard ME
    Hum Mol Genet; 2012 Oct; 21(R1):R45-51. PubMed ID: 22899652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using Sequence Variants in Linkage Disequilibrium with Causative Mutations to Improve Across-Breed Prediction in Dairy Cattle: A Simulation Study.
    van den Berg I; Boichard D; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Aug; 6(8):2553-61. PubMed ID: 27317779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The origin of selection signatures on bovine chromosome 6.
    Hayes BJ; Lien S; Nilsen H; Olsen HG; Berg P; Maceachern S; Potter S; Meuwissen TH
    Anim Genet; 2008 Apr; 39(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 18241301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marker-assisted selection reduces expected inbreeding but can result in large effects of hitchhiking.
    Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Jun; 127(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 20536636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genomic predictions across Nordic Holstein and Nordic Red using the genomic best linear unbiased prediction model with different genomic relationship matrices.
    Zhou L; Lund MS; Wang Y; Su G
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2014 Aug; 131(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 24750283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of Genomic Selection in a Rice Synthetic Population Developed for Recurrent Selection Breeding.
    Grenier C; Cao TV; Ospina Y; Quintero C; Châtel MH; Tohme J; Courtois B; Ahmadi N
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136594. PubMed ID: 26313446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.