These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24842952)

  • 1. Improving public interpretation of probabilistic test results: distributive evaluations.
    Pighin S; Gonzalez M; Savadori L; Girotto V
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Jan; 35(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 24842952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Natural Frequencies Do Not Foster Public Understanding of Medical Test Results.
    Pighin S; Gonzalez M; Savadori L; Girotto V
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Aug; 36(6):686-91. PubMed ID: 27034447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of numeracy on the comprehension of information about medicines in users of a patient information website.
    Gardner PH; McMillan B; Raynor DK; Woolf E; Knapp P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Jun; 83(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 21621949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fostering the Understanding of Positive Test Results.
    Pighin S; Tentori K; Savadori L; Girotto V
    Ann Behav Med; 2018 Oct; 52(11):909-919. PubMed ID: 30346498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Communicating weather forecast uncertainty: Do individual differences matter?
    Grounds MA; Joslyn SL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Mar; 24(1):18-33. PubMed ID: 29595302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual representation of statistical information improves diagnostic inferences in doctors and their patients.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Hoffrage U
    Soc Sci Med; 2013 Apr; 83():27-33. PubMed ID: 23465201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decisive evidence on a smaller-than-you-think phenomenon: revisiting the "1-in-X" effect on subjective medical probabilities.
    Sirota M; Juanchich M; Kostopoulou O; Hanak R
    Med Decis Making; 2014 May; 34(4):419-29. PubMed ID: 24310649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.
    Chitayat D; Langlois S; Douglas Wilson R; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Jul; 33(7):736-750. PubMed ID: 21749752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring Subjective Probabilities: The Effect of Response Mode on the Use of Focal Responses, Validity, and Respondents' Evaluations.
    Bruine de Bruin W; Carman KG
    Risk Anal; 2018 Oct; 38(10):2128-2143. PubMed ID: 30114338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parental duties and prenatal screening: does an offer of prenatal screening lead women to believe that they are morally compelled to test?
    García E; Timmermans DR; van Leeuwen E
    Midwifery; 2012 Dec; 28(6):e837-43. PubMed ID: 22079009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information.
    Peters E; Hibbard J; Slovic P; Dieckmann N
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(3):741-8. PubMed ID: 17485752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychological correlates of decision-making during prenatal diagnosis: a prospective study.
    Brondino N; Colombini G; Morandotti N; Podavini F; De Vidovich G; Formica M; Arossa A; De Silvestri A; Montanari L; Caverzasi E
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Jun; 34(2):68-74. PubMed ID: 23706024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Communication with patients during the prenatal testing procedure: an explorative qualitative study.
    van Zwieten M; Willems D; Knegt L; Leschot N
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):161-8. PubMed ID: 16406463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations.
    Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Smith DM; Ubel PA; Fagerlin A
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(5):663-71. PubMed ID: 17652180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving Intelligence Analysis With Decision Science.
    Dhami MK; Mandel DR; Mellers BA; Tetlock PE
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Nov; 10(6):753-7. PubMed ID: 26581731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Communication skills for prenatal counselling].
    Bitzer J; Tschudin S; Holzgreve W; Tercanli S
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2007 Apr; 96(16):629-36. PubMed ID: 17474289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Words or numbers? Communicating probability in intelligence analysis.
    Dhami MK; Mandel DR
    Am Psychol; 2021 Apr; 76(3):549-560. PubMed ID: 32700939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples.
    Lipkus IM; Samsa G; Rimer BK
    Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 11206945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy.
    Keller C; Siegrist M
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 19525484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.