These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

540 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24842992)

  • 1. Robust and accurate prediction of residue-residue interactions across protein interfaces using evolutionary information.
    Ovchinnikov S; Kamisetty H; Baker D
    Elife; 2014 May; 3():e02030. PubMed ID: 24842992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protein-protein interactions leave evolutionary footprints: High molecular coevolution at the core of interfaces.
    Teppa E; Zea DJ; Marino-Buslje C
    Protein Sci; 2017 Dec; 26(12):2438-2444. PubMed ID: 28980349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the utility of coevolution-based residue-residue contact predictions in a sequence- and structure-rich era.
    Kamisetty H; Ovchinnikov S; Baker D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Sep; 110(39):15674-9. PubMed ID: 24009338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conservation of coevolving protein interfaces bridges prokaryote-eukaryote homologies in the twilight zone.
    Rodriguez-Rivas J; Marsili S; Juan D; Valencia A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Dec; 113(52):15018-15023. PubMed ID: 27965389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integrating co-evolutionary signals and other properties of residue pairs to distinguish biological interfaces from crystal contacts.
    Hu J; Liu HF; Sun J; Wang J; Liu R
    Protein Sci; 2018 Sep; 27(9):1723-1735. PubMed ID: 29931702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Origins of coevolution between residues distant in protein 3D structures.
    Anishchenko I; Ovchinnikov S; Kamisetty H; Baker D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Aug; 114(34):9122-9127. PubMed ID: 28784799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Partner-aware prediction of interacting residues in protein-protein complexes from sequence data.
    Ahmad S; Mizuguchi K
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e29104. PubMed ID: 22194998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sequence co-evolution gives 3D contacts and structures of protein complexes.
    Hopf TA; Schärfe CP; Rodrigues JP; Green AG; Kohlbacher O; Sander C; Bonvin AM; Marks DS
    Elife; 2014 Sep; 3():. PubMed ID: 25255213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Large-scale identification of coevolution signals across homo-oligomeric protein interfaces by direct coupling analysis.
    Uguzzoni G; John Lovis S; Oteri F; Schug A; Szurmant H; Weigt M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Mar; 114(13):E2662-E2671. PubMed ID: 28289198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional cluster analysis identifies interfaces and functional residue clusters in proteins.
    Landgraf R; Xenarios I; Eisenberg D
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 307(5):1487-502. PubMed ID: 11292355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A PDB-wide, evolution-based assessment of protein-protein interfaces.
    Baskaran K; Duarte JM; Biyani N; Bliven S; Capitani G
    BMC Struct Biol; 2014 Oct; 14():22. PubMed ID: 25326082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of contact residue pairs based on co-substitution between sites in protein structures.
    Miyazawa S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e54252. PubMed ID: 23342110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of protein-RNA residue-base contacts using two-dimensional conditional random field with the lasso.
    Hayashida M; Kamada M; Song J; Akutsu T
    BMC Syst Biol; 2013; 7 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S15. PubMed ID: 24564966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Joint evolutionary trees: a large-scale method to predict protein interfaces based on sequence sampling.
    Engelen S; Trojan LA; Sacquin-Mora S; Lavery R; Carbone A
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Jan; 5(1):e1000267. PubMed ID: 19165315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. APIS: accurate prediction of hot spots in protein interfaces by combining protrusion index with solvent accessibility.
    Xia JF; Zhao XM; Song J; Huang DS
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Apr; 11():174. PubMed ID: 20377884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. i-Patch: interprotein contact prediction using local network information.
    Hamer R; Luo Q; Armitage JP; Reinert G; Deane CM
    Proteins; 2010 Oct; 78(13):2781-97. PubMed ID: 20635422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of protein-protein interactions: unifying evolution and structure at protein interfaces.
    Tuncbag N; Gursoy A; Keskin O
    Phys Biol; 2011 Jun; 8(3):035006. PubMed ID: 21572173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting where small molecules bind at protein-protein interfaces.
    Walter P; Metzger J; Thiel C; Helms V
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e58583. PubMed ID: 23505538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simultaneous identification of specifically interacting paralogs and interprotein contacts by direct coupling analysis.
    Gueudré T; Baldassi C; Zamparo M; Weigt M; Pagnani A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Oct; 113(43):12186-12191. PubMed ID: 27729520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. STING Contacts: a web-based application for identification and analysis of amino acid contacts within protein structure and across protein interfaces.
    Mancini AL; Higa RH; Oliveira A; Dominiquini F; Kuser PR; Yamagishi ME; Togawa RC; Neshich G
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 20(13):2145-7. PubMed ID: 15073001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.