These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24844589)

  • 21. Contributing factors to adoption of electronic medical records in otolaryngology offices.
    Mahboubi H; Salibian AA; Wu EC; Patel MS; Armstrong WB
    Laryngoscope; 2013 Nov; 123(11):2658-63. PubMed ID: 23712468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 summary.
    Cherry DK; Hing E; Woodwell DA; Rechtsteiner EA
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2008 Aug; (3):1-39. PubMed ID: 18972720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Physicians in nonprimary care and small practices and those age 55 and older lag in adopting electronic health record systems.
    Decker SL; Jamoom EW; Sisk JE
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2012 May; 31(5):1108-14. PubMed ID: 22535502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of the HITECH financial incentives on EHR adoption in small, physician-owned practices.
    Cohen MF
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Oct; 94():143-54. PubMed ID: 27573322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2000 summary.
    Cherry DK; Woodwell DA
    Adv Data; 2002 Jun; (328):1-32. PubMed ID: 12661586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Physician capability to electronically exchange clinical information, 2011.
    Patel V; Swain MJ; King J; Furukawa MF
    Am J Manag Care; 2013 Oct; 19(10):835-43. PubMed ID: 24304162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2005 summary.
    Cherry DK; Woodwell DA; Rechtsteiner EA
    Adv Data; 2007 Jun; (387):1-39. PubMed ID: 17703793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Physician EHR Adoption and Potentially Preventable Hospital Admissions among Medicare Beneficiaries: Panel Data Evidence, 2010-2013.
    Lammers EJ; McLaughlin CG; Barna M
    Health Serv Res; 2016 Dec; 51(6):2056-2075. PubMed ID: 27766628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computers in the examination room and the electronic health record: physicians' perceived impact on clinical encounters before and after full installation and implementation.
    Doyle RJ; Wang N; Anthony D; Borkan J; Shield RR; Goldman RE
    Fam Pract; 2012 Oct; 29(5):601-8. PubMed ID: 22379185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Are low income patients receiving the benefits of electronic health records? A statewide survey.
    Butler MJ; Harootunian G; Johnson WG
    Health Informatics J; 2013 Jun; 19(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 23715209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Electronic health record usage behaviors in primary care medical practices: A survey of family physicians in Canada.
    Paré G; Raymond L; Guinea AO; Poba-Nzaou P; Trudel MC; Marsan J; Micheneau T
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Oct; 84(10):857-67. PubMed ID: 26238705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Electronic Health Record Use a Bitter Pill for Many Physicians.
    Meigs SL; Solomon M
    Perspect Health Inf Manag; 2016; 13(Winter):1d. PubMed ID: 26903782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of payer mix on electronic health record adoption by physicians.
    Menachemi N; Matthews MC; Ford EW; Brooks RG
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2007; 32(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 17438394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Adoption of electronic health records and preparations for demonstrating meaningful use: an American Academy of Ophthalmology survey.
    Boland MV; Chiang MF; Lim MC; Wedemeyer L; Epley KD; McCannel CA; Silverstone DE; Lum F;
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Aug; 120(8):1702-10. PubMed ID: 23806425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ambulatory care visits to physician offices, hospital outpatient departments, and emergency departments: United States, 1999--2000.
    Burt CW; Schappert SM
    Vital Health Stat 13; 2004 Sep; (157):1-70. PubMed ID: 15499797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Electronic health records: which practices have them, and how are clinicians using them?
    Simon SR; McCarthy ML; Kaushal R; Jenter CA; Volk LA; Poon EG; Yee KC; Orav EJ; Williams DH; Bates DW
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Feb; 14(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18211642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1996 summary.
    Woodwell DA
    Adv Data; 1997 Dec; (295):1-25. PubMed ID: 10182646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1995-96 summary.
    Schappert SM; Nelson C
    Vital Health Stat 13; 1999 Nov; (142):i-vi, 1-122. PubMed ID: 10597666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. More than four in five office-based physicians could qualify for federal electronic health record incentives.
    Bruen BK; Ku L; Burke MF; Buntin MB
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2011 Mar; 30(3):472-80. PubMed ID: 21383366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Physician experience with electronic health record systems that meet meaningful use criteria: NAMCS physician workflow survey, 2011.
    Jamoom E; Patel V; King J; Furukawa MF
    NCHS Data Brief; 2013 Sep; (129):1-8. PubMed ID: 24152607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.