250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24844841)
21. An adaptive multi-stage phase I dose-finding design incorporating continuous efficacy and toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.
Du Y; Yin J; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar SJ
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):271-286. PubMed ID: 30403559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Dose finding methods for targeted agents: new perspectives].
Paoletti X; Postel-Vinay S; Servois V; Doussau A; Ollivier L; Le Tourneau C
Bull Cancer; 2010 Dec; 97(12):1485-95. PubMed ID: 21220226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dose-finding design and benchmark for a right censored endpoint.
Andrillon A; Chevret S; Lee SM; Biard L
J Biopharm Stat; 2020 Nov; 30(6):948-963. PubMed ID: 33222634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. TITE-BOIN-ET: Time-to-event Bayesian optimal interval design to accelerate dose-finding based on both efficacy and toxicity outcomes.
Takeda K; Morita S; Taguri M
Pharm Stat; 2020 May; 19(3):335-349. PubMed ID: 31829517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A utility-based Bayesian optimal interval (U-BOIN) phase I/II design to identify the optimal biological dose for targeted and immune therapies.
Zhou Y; Lee JJ; Yuan Y
Stat Med; 2019 Dec; 38(28):5299-5316. PubMed ID: 31621952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. BOIN-ET: Bayesian optimal interval design for dose finding based on both efficacy and toxicity outcomes.
Takeda K; Taguri M; Morita S
Pharm Stat; 2018 Jul; 17(4):383-395. PubMed ID: 29700965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Adaptive phase I-II clinical trial designs identifying optimal biological doses for targeted agents and immunotherapies.
Zang Y; Guo B; Qiu Y; Liu H; Opyrchal M; Lu X
Clin Trials; 2024 Jun; 21(3):298-307. PubMed ID: 38205644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An adaptive gBOIN design with shrinkage boundaries for phase I dose-finding trials.
Mu R; Hu Z; Xu G; Pan H
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):278. PubMed ID: 34895153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Bayesian adaptive model selection design for optimal biological dose finding in phase I/II clinical trials.
Lin R; Yin G; Shi H
Biostatistics; 2023 Apr; 24(2):277-294. PubMed ID: 34296266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A web application for evaluating Phase I methods using a non-parametric optimal benchmark.
Wages NA; Varhegyi N
Clin Trials; 2017 Oct; 14(5):553-557. PubMed ID: 28649874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Improved adaptive randomization strategies for a seamless Phase I/II dose-finding design.
Yan D; Wages NA; Dressler EV
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):333-347. PubMed ID: 30451068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparative study of adaptive trial designs for dose optimization.
Zhang J; Chen X; Li B; Yan F
Pharm Stat; 2023; 22(5):797-814. PubMed ID: 37156731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An adaptive dose-finding method using a change-point model for molecularly targeted agents in phase I trials.
Sato H; Hirakawa A; Hamada C
Stat Med; 2016 Oct; 35(23):4093-109. PubMed ID: 27221807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Adaptive dose-finding based on safety and feasibility in early-phase clinical trials of adoptive cell immunotherapy.
Wages NA; Fadul CE
Clin Trials; 2020 Apr; 17(2):157-165. PubMed ID: 31856602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluating the performance of copula models in phase I-II clinical trials under model misspecification.
Cunanan K; Koopmeiners JS
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Apr; 14():51. PubMed ID: 24731155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Efficiency of new dose escalation designs in dose-finding phase I trials of molecularly targeted agents.
Le Tourneau C; Gan HK; Razak AR; Paoletti X
PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e51039. PubMed ID: 23251419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A dose-finding approach for genomic patterns in phase I trials.
Kaneko S; Hirakawa A; Kakurai Y; Hamada C
J Biopharm Stat; 2020 Sep; 30(5):834-853. PubMed ID: 32310707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Two-stage dose finding for cytostatic agents in phase I oncology trials.
Yin G; Zheng S; Xu J
Stat Med; 2013 Feb; 32(4):644-60. PubMed ID: 22855354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Challenges of phase 1 clinical trials evaluating immune checkpoint-targeted antibodies.
Postel-Vinay S; Aspeslagh S; Lanoy E; Robert C; Soria JC; Marabelle A
Ann Oncol; 2016 Feb; 27(2):214-24. PubMed ID: 26578728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Adaptive designs for dose-finding studies based on sigmoid Emax model.
Dragalin V; Hsuan F; Padmanabhan SK
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):1051-70. PubMed ID: 18027216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
