262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24845018)
21. GPCALMA: implementation in Italian hospitals of a computer aided detection system for breast lesions by mammography examination.
Lauria A
Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):58-72. PubMed ID: 18602854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dynamic multiple thresholding breast boundary detection algorithm for mammograms.
Wu YT; Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Hadjiiski LM; Daly CP; Douglas JA; Zhang Y; Sahiner B; Shi J; Wei J
Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):391-401. PubMed ID: 20175501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A regional registration method to find corresponding mass lesions in temporal mammogram pairs.
Timp S; van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2629-38. PubMed ID: 16193793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A registration framework for the comparison of mammogram sequences.
Marias K; Behrenbruch C; Parbhoo S; Seifalian A; Brady M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Jun; 24(6):782-90. PubMed ID: 15957600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Hybrid cosine and Radon transform-based processing for digital mammogram feature extraction and classification with SVM.
Lahmiri S; Boukadoum M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():5104-7. PubMed ID: 22255487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Study of mass segmentation algorithm for digital mammograms].
Chen L; Zhang K; Jin Z
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 25(6):1282-4. PubMed ID: 19166192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Mutual information-based template matching scheme for detection of breast masses: from mammography to digital breast tomosynthesis.
Mazurowski MA; Lo JY; Harrawood BP; Tourassi GD
J Biomed Inform; 2011 Oct; 44(5):815-23. PubMed ID: 21554985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The performance of computer-aided detection when analyzing prior mammograms of newly detected breast cancers with special focus on the time interval from initial imaging to detection.
Malich A; Schmidt S; Fischer DR; Facius M; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 69(3):574-8. PubMed ID: 18337045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of computer-aided detection of lesions in mammograms obtained with a digital phase-contrast mammography system.
Tanaka T; Nitta N; Ohta S; Kobayashi T; Kano A; Tsuchiya K; Murakami Y; Kitahara S; Wakamiya M; Furukawa A; Takahashi M; Murata K
Eur Radiol; 2009 Dec; 19(12):2886-95. PubMed ID: 19585121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An anatomically oriented breast coordinate system for mammogram analysis.
Brandt SS; Karemore G; Karssemeijer N; Nielsen M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Oct; 30(10):1841-51. PubMed ID: 21609879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Improved location features for linkage of regions across ipsilateral mammograms.
Tanner C; van Schie G; Lesniak JM; Karssemeijer N; Székely G
Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1265-72. PubMed ID: 23731758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography.
Eltonsy NH; Tourassi GD; Elmaghraby AS
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jun; 26(6):880-9. PubMed ID: 17679338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Determination of similarity measures for pairs of mass lesions on mammograms by use of BI-RADS lesion descriptors and image features.
Muramatsu C; Li Q; Schmidt RA; Shiraishi J; Doi K
Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):443-9. PubMed ID: 19268856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fully automated nipple detection in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Chae SH; Jeong JW; Choi JH; Chae EY; Kim HH; Choi YW; Lee S
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():113-120. PubMed ID: 28391808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Automatic breast region extraction from digital mammograms for PACS and telemammography applications.
Lou SL; Lin HD; Lin KP; Hoogstrate D
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2000; 24(4):205-20. PubMed ID: 10842045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Automatic pectoral muscle segmentation on mediolateral oblique view mammograms.
Kwok SM; Chandrasekhar R; Attikiouzel Y; Rickard MT
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Sep; 23(9):1129-40. PubMed ID: 15377122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quantitative assessment of breast density from digitized mammograms into Tabar's patterns.
Jamal N; Ng KH; Looi LM; McLean D; Zulfiqar A; Tan SP; Liew WF; Shantini A; Ranganathan S
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5843-57. PubMed ID: 17068368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Algorithmic scatter correction in dual-energy digital mammography.
Chen X; Nishikawa RM; Chan ST; Lau BA; Zhang L; Mou X
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111919. PubMed ID: 24320452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications: comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
Ge J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Chan HP
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):981-1000. PubMed ID: 17264365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
