233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24845082)
1. Attitudes of non-African American focus group participants toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.
Yu JH; Crouch J; Jamal SM; Bamshad MJ; Tabor HK
Am J Med Genet A; 2014 Sep; 164A(9):2153-60. PubMed ID: 24845082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.
Yu JH; Crouch J; Jamal SM; Tabor HK; Bamshad MJ
Am J Med Genet A; 2013 May; 161A(5):1064-72. PubMed ID: 23610051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of metaphors about exome and whole genome sequencing.
Nelson SC; Crouch JM; Bamshad MJ; Tabor HK; Yu JH
Am J Med Genet A; 2016 May; 170A(5):1127-33. PubMed ID: 26822973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing.
Yu JH; Harrell TM; Jamal SM; Tabor HK; Bamshad MJ
Am J Hum Genet; 2014 Jul; 95(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 24975944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. When bins blur: Patient perspectives on categories of results from clinical whole genome sequencing.
Jamal L; Robinson JO; Christensen KD; Blumenthal-Barby J; Slashinski MJ; Perry DL; Vassy JL; Wycliff J; Green RC; McGuire AL
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(2):82-88. PubMed ID: 28949844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. "We don't know her history, her background": adoptive parents' perspectives on whole genome sequencing results.
Crouch J; Yu JH; Shankar AG; Tabor HK
J Genet Couns; 2015 Feb; 24(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 25011977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parental Views on Expanded Newborn Screening Using Whole-Genome Sequencing.
Joseph G; Chen F; Harris-Wai J; Puck JM; Young C; Koenig BA
Pediatrics; 2016 Jan; 137 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S36-46. PubMed ID: 26729702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project.
Sanderson SC; Linderman MD; Suckiel SA; Diaz GA; Zinberg RE; Ferryman K; Wasserstein M; Kasarskis A; Schadt EE
Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Jan; 24(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 26036856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A road map for the future: An exploration of attitudes, perceptions, and beliefs among African Americans to tailor health promotion of cancer-related genetic counseling and testing.
Lumpkins CY; Philp A; Nelson KL; Miller LM; Greiner KA
J Genet Couns; 2020 Aug; 29(4):518-529. PubMed ID: 32291871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient perspectives on whole-genome sequencing for undiagnosed diseases.
Boeldt DL; Cheung C; Ariniello L; Darst BF; Topol S; Schork NJ; Philis-Tsimikas A; Torkamani A; Fortmann AL; Bloss CS
Per Med; 2017 Jan; 14(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 29749824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Public attitudes in Japan toward participation in whole genome sequencing studies.
Okita T; Ohashi N; Kabata D; Shintani A; Kato K
Hum Genomics; 2018 Apr; 12(1):21. PubMed ID: 29653595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variant detection sensitivity and biases in whole genome and exome sequencing.
Meynert AM; Ansari M; FitzPatrick DR; Taylor MS
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Jul; 15(1):247. PubMed ID: 25038816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic software design for clinical exome and genome analyses: insights from bioinformaticians, clinical geneticists, and genetic counselors.
Shyr C; Kushniruk A; van Karnebeek CD; Wasserman WW
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Mar; 23(2):257-68. PubMed ID: 26117142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Parents perspectives on whole genome sequencing for their children: qualified enthusiasm?
Anderson JA; Meyn MS; Shuman C; Zlotnik Shaul R; Mantella LE; Szego MJ; Bowdin S; Monfared N; Hayeems RZ
J Med Ethics; 2017 Aug; 43(8):535-539. PubMed ID: 27888232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Overcoming challenges to meaningful informed consent for whole genome sequencing in pediatric cancer research.
Oberg JA; Glade Bender JL; Cohn EG; Morris M; Ruiz J; Chung WK; Appelbaum PS; Kung AL; Levine JM
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2015 Aug; 62(8):1374-80. PubMed ID: 25832998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preferences for and acceptability of receiving pharmacogenomic results by mail: A focus group study with a primarily African-American cohort.
Chan PA; Lewis KL; Biesecker BB; Erby LH; Fasaye GA; Epps S; Biesecker LG; Turbitt E
J Genet Couns; 2021 Dec; 30(6):1582-1590. PubMed ID: 33876469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pathogenic variants for Mendelian and complex traits in exomes of 6,517 European and African Americans: implications for the return of incidental results.
Tabor HK; Auer PL; Jamal SM; Chong JX; Yu JH; Gordon AS; Graubert TA; O'Donnell CJ; Rich SS; Nickerson DA; ; Bamshad MJ
Am J Hum Genet; 2014 Aug; 95(2):183-93. PubMed ID: 25087612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Return of non-ACMG recommended incidental genetic findings to pediatric patients: considerations and opportunities from experiences in genomic sequencing.
Bowling KM; Thompson ML; Kelly MA; Scollon S; Slavotinek AM; Powell BC; Kirmse BM; Hendon LG; Brothers KB; Korf BR; Cooper GM; Greally JM; Hurst ACE
Genome Med; 2022 Nov; 14(1):131. PubMed ID: 36414972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Facio FM; Eidem H; Fisher T; Brooks S; Linn A; Kaphingst KA; Biesecker LG; Biesecker BB
Eur J Hum Genet; 2013 Mar; 21(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 22892536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Engagement and return of results preferences among a primarily African American genomic sequencing research cohort.
Lewis KL; Turbitt E; Chan PA; Epps S; Biesecker BB; Erby LAH; Fasaye GA; Biesecker LG
Am J Hum Genet; 2021 May; 108(5):894-902. PubMed ID: 33887195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
