606 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24845950)
21. Mechanistic variables can enhance predictive models of endotherm distributions: the American pika under current, past, and future climates.
Mathewson PD; Moyer-Horner L; Beever EA; Briscoe NJ; Kearney M; Yahn JM; Porter WP
Glob Chang Biol; 2017 Mar; 23(3):1048-1064. PubMed ID: 27500587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Probabilistic accounting of uncertainty in forecasts of species distributions under climate change.
Wenger SJ; Som NA; Dauwalter DC; Isaak DJ; Neville HM; Luce CH; Dunham JB; Young MK; Fausch KD; Rieman BE
Glob Chang Biol; 2013 Nov; 19(11):3343-54. PubMed ID: 23765608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does scale matter? A systematic review of incorporating biological realism when predicting changes in species distributions.
Record S; Strecker A; Tuanmu MN; Beaudrot L; Zarnetske P; Belmaker J; Gerstner B
PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194650. PubMed ID: 29652936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Forecasting phenology: from species variability to community patterns.
Diez JM; Ibáñez I; Miller-Rushing AJ; Mazer SJ; Crimmins TM; Crimmins MA; Bertelsen CD; Inouye DW
Ecol Lett; 2012 Jun; 15(6):545-53. PubMed ID: 22433120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Predicted climate-driven bird distribution changes and forecasted conservation conflicts in a neotropical savanna.
Marini MA; Barbet-Massin M; Lopes LE; Jiguet F
Conserv Biol; 2009 Dec; 23(6):1558-67. PubMed ID: 19500118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Genetically informed ecological niche models improve climate change predictions.
Ikeda DH; Max TL; Allan GJ; Lau MK; Shuster SM; Whitham TG
Glob Chang Biol; 2017 Jan; 23(1):164-176. PubMed ID: 27543682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Predicting shifts in parasite distribution with climate change: a multitrophic level approach.
Pickles RS; Thornton D; Feldman R; Marques A; Murray DL
Glob Chang Biol; 2013 Sep; 19(9):2645-54. PubMed ID: 23666800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impacts of Climate Change on the Global Invasion Potential of the African Clawed Frog Xenopus laevis.
Ihlow F; Courant J; Secondi J; Herrel A; Rebelo R; Measey GJ; Lillo F; De Villiers FA; Vogt S; De Busschere C; Backeljau T; Rödder D
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0154869. PubMed ID: 27248830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Predicting the likely response of data-poor ecosystems to climate change using space-for-time substitution across domains.
Lester RE; Close PG; Barton JL; Pope AJ; Brown SC
Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Nov; 20(11):3471-81. PubMed ID: 24832685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sensitivity to thermal extremes in Australian Drosophila implies similar impacts of climate change on the distribution of widespread and tropical species.
Overgaard J; Kearney MR; Hoffmann AA
Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Jun; 20(6):1738-50. PubMed ID: 24549716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Projected climate-induced habitat loss for salmonids in the John Day River network, Oregon, U.S.A.
Ruesch AS; Torgersen CE; Lawler JJ; Olden JD; Peterson EE; Volk CJ; Lawrence DJ
Conserv Biol; 2012 Oct; 26(5):873-82. PubMed ID: 22827880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Model uncertainties do not affect observed patterns of species richness in the Amazon.
Sales LP; Neves OV; De Marco P; Loyola R
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0183785. PubMed ID: 29023503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Spatial sorting and range shifts: consequences for evolutionary potential and genetic signature of a dispersal trait.
Cobben MM; Verboom J; Opdam PF; Hoekstra RF; Jochem R; Smulders MJ
J Theor Biol; 2015 May; 373():92-9. PubMed ID: 25817038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predicting the genetic consequences of future climate change: The power of coupling spatial demography, the coalescent, and historical landscape changes.
Brown JL; Weber JJ; Alvarado-Serrano DF; Hickerson MJ; Franks SJ; Carnaval AC
Am J Bot; 2016 Jan; 103(1):153-63. PubMed ID: 26747843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Demographic consequences of climate change and land cover help explain a history of extirpations and range contraction in a declining snake species.
Pomara LY; LeDee OE; Martin KJ; Zuckerberg B
Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Jul; 20(7):2087-99. PubMed ID: 24357530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Correlative climatic niche models predict real and virtual species distributions equally well.
Journé V; Barnagaud JY; Bernard C; Crochet PA; Morin X
Ecology; 2020 Jan; 101(1):e02912. PubMed ID: 31605622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Separating direct and indirect effects of global change: a population dynamic modeling approach using readily available field data.
Farrer EC; Ashton IW; Knape J; Suding KN
Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Apr; 20(4):1238-50. PubMed ID: 24115317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Illuminating geographical patterns in species' range shifts.
Grenouillet G; Comte L
Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Oct; 20(10):3080-91. PubMed ID: 24616088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accounting for sources of uncertainty when forecasting population responses to climate change.
Zylstra ER; Zipkin EF
J Anim Ecol; 2021 Mar; 90(3):558-561. PubMed ID: 33660878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A framework for using niche models to estimate impacts of climate change on species distributions.
Anderson RP
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2013 Sep; 1297():8-28. PubMed ID: 25098379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
