These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24846785)

  • 1. The many faces of malingering and participant response strategies: new methodologies in the Attachment and Clinical Issues Questionnaire (ACIQ).
    Fugett A; Thomas SW; Lindberg MA
    J Gen Psychol; 2014; 141(2):80-97. PubMed ID: 24846785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and validation of the Malingering Discriminant Function Index for the MMPI-2.
    Bacchiochi JR; Bagby RM
    J Pers Assess; 2006 Aug; 87(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 16856786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utility of the Deceptive-Subtle items in the detection of malingering.
    Bagby RM; Nicholson R; Buis T
    J Pers Assess; 1998 Jun; 70(3):405-15. PubMed ID: 9841263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Specificity of the MMPI-2 Fake Bad Scale as a marker for personal injury malingering.
    Iverson GL; Henrichs TF; Barton EA; Allen S
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Feb; 90(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 11898973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The construct validity of the Lees-Haley Fake Bad Scale. Does this scale measure somatic malingering and feigned emotional distress?
    Butcher JN; Arbisi PA; Atlis MM; McNulty JL
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2003 Jul; 18(5):473-85. PubMed ID: 14591444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Attachment and Clinical Issues Questionnaire (ACIQ): scale development.
    Lindberg MA; Thomas SW
    J Genet Psychol; 2011; 172(4):329-52. PubMed ID: 22256681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The detection of malingering and deception with a short form of the MMPI-2 based on the L, F, and K scales.
    Cassisi JE; Workman DE
    J Clin Psychol; 1992 Jan; 48(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 1556216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of MCMI-II and 16PF validity scales.
    Grossman LS; Craig RJ
    J Pers Assess; 1995 Apr; 64(2):384-9. PubMed ID: 7722863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do warnings deter rather than produce more sophisticated malingering?
    Schenk K; Sullivan KA
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2010 Aug; 32(7):752-62. PubMed ID: 20306357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity of the M Test: simulation-design and natural-group approaches.
    Gillis JR; Rogers R; Bagby RM
    J Pers Assess; 1991 Aug; 57(1):130-40. PubMed ID: 1920026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering.
    Heilbronner RL; Sweet JJ; Morgan JE; Larrabee GJ; Millis SR;
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 Sep; 23(7):1093-129. PubMed ID: 19735055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response to Butcher et al., The construct validity of the Lees-Haley Fake-Bad Scale..
    Greve KW; Bianchini KJ
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2004 Apr; 19(3):337-9; author reply 341-5. PubMed ID: 15033219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Attachment and Clinical Issues Questionnaire: a new methodology for science and practice in criminology and forensics.
    Lindberg MA; Fugett A; Lounder L
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2014 Oct; 58(10):1166-85. PubMed ID: 25469369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing the incremental utility of the negative impression-positive impression differential in detecting simulated personality assessment inventory profiles.
    Hopwood CJ; Talbert CA; Morey LC; Rogers R
    J Clin Psychol; 2008 Mar; 64(3):338-43. PubMed ID: 18302214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Commentary on Butcher, Arbisi, Atlis, and McNulty (2003) on the Fake Bad Scale.
    Lees-Haley PR; Fox DD
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2004 Apr; 19(3):333-6; author reply 341-5. PubMed ID: 15033218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The predictive capacity of the MMPI-2 and PAI validity scales and indexes to detect coached and uncoached feigning.
    Bagby RM; Nicholson RA; Bacchiochi JR; Ryder AG; Bury AS
    J Pers Assess; 2002 Feb; 78(1):69-86. PubMed ID: 11936213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the Lees-Haley Fake Bad Scale, Henry-Heilbronner Index, and restructured clinical scale 1 in identifying noncredible symptom reporting.
    Henry GK; Heilbronner RL; Mittenberg W; Enders C; Stanczak SR
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2008 Sep; 22(5):919-29. PubMed ID: 18756392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and validation of a Response Bias Scale (RBS) for the MMPI-2.
    Gervais RO; Ben-Porath YS; Wygant DB; Green P
    Assessment; 2007 Jun; 14(2):196-208. PubMed ID: 17504891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tests of the Attachment and Clinical Issues Questionnaire as It Applies to Alcohol Dependence.
    Lindberg MA; Fugett A; Carter JE
    J Addict Med; 2015; 9(4):286-95. PubMed ID: 25974379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing measures of attachment: "To whom one turns in times of stress", parental warmth, and partner satisfaction.
    Lindberg MA; Fugett A; Thomas SW
    J Genet Psychol; 2012; 173(1):41-62. PubMed ID: 22428375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.