These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24846939)

  • 1. [Bayesian methods for genomic breeding value estimation].
    Wang C; Ding X; Liu J; Yin Z; Zhang Q
    Yi Chuan; 2014 Feb; 36(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 24846939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of Bayesian and BLUP alphabets for genomic prediction: analysis, comparison and results.
    Meher PK; Rustgi S; Kumar A
    Heredity (Edinb); 2022 Jun; 128(6):519-530. PubMed ID: 35508540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic prediction of breeding values using previously estimated SNP variances.
    Calus MP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):52. PubMed ID: 25928875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A computationally efficient algorithm for genomic prediction using a Bayesian model.
    Wang T; Chen YP; Goddard ME; Meuwissen TH; Kemper KE; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):34. PubMed ID: 25926276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variable selection models for genomic selection using whole-genome sequence data and singular value decomposition.
    Meuwissen THE; Indahl UG; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):94. PubMed ID: 29281962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of genomic information increases the accuracy of breeding value predictions for sea louse (Caligus rogercresseyi) resistance in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
    Correa K; Bangera R; Figueroa R; Lhorente JP; Yáñez JM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):15. PubMed ID: 28143593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.
    Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; van Son M; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek EH; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28177367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds.
    Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Bayesian method and its variational approximation for prediction of genomic breeding values in multiple traits.
    Hayashi T; Iwata H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Jan; 14():34. PubMed ID: 23363272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
    Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between estimation of breeding values and fixed effects using Bayesian and empirical BLUP estimation under selection on parents and missing pedigree information.
    Schenkel FS; Schaeffer LR; Boettcher PJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2002; 34(1):41-59. PubMed ID: 11929624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of genomic selection using stochastic search variable selection in Australian Holstein Friesian dairy cattle.
    Verbyla KL; Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Goddard ME
    Genet Res (Camb); 2009 Oct; 91(5):307-11. PubMed ID: 19922694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracies of breeding values for dry matter intake using nongenotyped animals and predictor traits in different lactations.
    Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Veerkamp RF; de Haas Y; Calus MPL; Ten Napel J
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Nov; 100(11):9103-9114. PubMed ID: 28865857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EM algorithm for Bayesian estimation of genomic breeding values.
    Hayashi T; Iwata H
    BMC Genet; 2010 Jan; 11():3. PubMed ID: 20092655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.
    Calus MP; Huang H; Vereijken A; Visscher J; Ten Napel J; Windig JJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):57. PubMed ID: 25927219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
    Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fast genomic predictions via Bayesian G-BLUP and multilocus models of threshold traits including censored Gaussian data.
    Kärkkäinen HP; Sillanpää MJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2013 Sep; 3(9):1511-23. PubMed ID: 23821618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracies of genomic prediction of feed efficiency traits using different prediction and validation methods in an experimental Nelore cattle population.
    Silva RM; Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Magalhães AF; Irano N; Carvalheiro R; Canesin RC; Mercadante ME; Boligon AA; Baldi FS; Misztal I; Albuquerque LG
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Sep; 94(9):3613-3623. PubMed ID: 27898889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for meat tenderness in Polled Nellore cattle.
    Magnabosco CU; Lopes FB; Fragoso RC; Eifert EC; Valente BD; Rosa GJ; Sainz RD
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Jul; 94(7):2752-60. PubMed ID: 27482662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.