182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24848293)
21. Differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia using monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted imaging.
Liu X; Zhou L; Peng W; Wang C; Wang H
Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 31(8):1318-24. PubMed ID: 23791546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas: diagnostic benefit from an intravoxel incoherent motion model-based 3 b-value analysis.
Concia M; Sprinkart AM; Penner AH; Brossart P; Gieseke J; Schild HH; Willinek WA; Mürtz P
Invest Radiol; 2014 Feb; 49(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 24089021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Differentiation of pancreas carcinoma from healthy pancreatic tissue using multiple b-values: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion derived parameters.
Lemke A; Laun FB; Klauss M; Re TJ; Simon D; Delorme S; Schad LR; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2009 Dec; 44(12):769-75. PubMed ID: 19838121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Quantified ADC histogram analysis: a new method for differentiating mass-forming focal pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer.
Ma X; Zhao X; Ouyang H; Sun F; Zhang H; Zhou C
Acta Radiol; 2014 Sep; 55(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24167322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diffusion weighted imaging of liver lesions suspect for metastases: Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and lesion contrast are independent from Gd-EOB-DTPA administration.
Benndorf M; Schelhorn J; Dietzel M; Kaiser WA; Baltzer PA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):e849-53. PubMed ID: 22575171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. High resolution diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas using reduced field of view single-shot echo-planar imaging at 3 T.
Ma C; Li YJ; Pan CS; Wang H; Wang J; Chen SY; Lu JP
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Feb; 32(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 24231348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and conventional DWI techniques in the assessment of rectal carcinoma at 3.0T: Image quality and histological T staging.
Peng Y; Li Z; Tang H; Wang Y; Hu X; Shen Y; Hu D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):967-975. PubMed ID: 28691219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver in patients with chronic liver disease: comparison of monopolar and bipolar diffusion gradients for image quality and lesion detection.
Lewis S; Kamath A; Chatterji M; Patel A; Shyknevsky I; Dyvorne HA; Kuehn B; Taouli B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 25539238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of the diagnostic performances of diffusion parameters in diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions.
Cakir O; Arslan A; Inan N; Anık Y; Sarısoy T; Gumustas S; Akansel G
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e801-6. PubMed ID: 24099642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Prostate: Image Quality and Geometric Distortion of Readout-Segmented Versus Selective-Excitation Accelerated Acquisitions.
Barth BK; Cornelius A; Nanz D; Eberli D; Donati OF
Invest Radiol; 2015 Nov; 50(11):785-91. PubMed ID: 26146870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen at 3.0 Tesla: image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient reproducibility compared with 1.5 Tesla.
Rosenkrantz AB; Oei M; Babb JS; Niver BE; Taouli B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jan; 33(1):128-35. PubMed ID: 21182130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of gadoxetic acid on quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver.
Colagrande S; Mazzoni LN; Mazzoni E; Pradella S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Aug; 38(2):365-70. PubMed ID: 23239165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Liver diffusion-weighted MR imaging: reproducibility comparison of ADC measurements obtained with multiple breath-hold, free-breathing, respiratory-triggered, and navigator-triggered techniques.
Chen X; Qin L; Pan D; Huang Y; Yan L; Wang G; Liu Y; Liang C; Liu Z
Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):113-25. PubMed ID: 24475860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient calculation between two-point and multipoint B value analyses in prostate cancer and benign prostate tissue at 3 T: preliminary experience.
Park SY; Kim CK; Park BK; Kwon GY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W287-94. PubMed ID: 25148186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Lymphomas and glioblastomas: differences in the apparent diffusion coefficient evaluated with high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T.
Doskaliyev A; Yamasaki F; Ohtaki M; Kajiwara Y; Takeshima Y; Watanabe Y; Takayasu T; Amatya VJ; Akiyama Y; Sugiyama K; Kurisu K
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 21129872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diffusion-weighted imaging of ocular melanoma.
Erb-Eigner K; Willerding G; Taupitz M; Hamm B; Asbach P
Invest Radiol; 2013 Oct; 48(10):702-7. PubMed ID: 23614974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of pancreatic cancer by multiple breath-hold dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T.
Yao X; Zeng M; Wang H; Sun F; Rao S; Ji Y
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):e917-22. PubMed ID: 22695786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Field strength and diffusion encoding technique affect the apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen.
Dale BM; Braithwaite AC; Boll DT; Merkle EM
Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 20027117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Usefulness of the quantitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted mri in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament tears.
Park HJ; Lee SY; Rho MH; Kim MS; Kwon HJ; Chung EC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Nov; 44(5):1116-1122. PubMed ID: 27079566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Malignant hepatic tumors: short-term reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficients with breath-hold and respiratory-triggered diffusion-weighted MR imaging.
Kim SY; Lee SS; Byun JH; Park SH; Kim JK; Park B; Kim N; Lee MG
Radiology; 2010 Jun; 255(3):815-23. PubMed ID: 20501719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
