716 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24848389)
1. Elective caesarean section for breech presentation in first pregnancy and subsequent mode of labour.
Khaskheli MN; Baloch S; Sheeba A
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2014 May; 24(5):323-6. PubMed ID: 24848389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What are the implications for the next delivery in primigravidae who have an elective caesarean section for breech presentation?
Coughlan C; Kearney R; Turner MJ
BJOG; 2002 Jun; 109(6):624-6. PubMed ID: 12118638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: an effective procedure to reduce the caesarean section rate].
Lojacono A; Donarini G; Valcamonico A; Soregaroli M; Frusca T
Minerva Ginecol; 2003 Dec; 55(6):519-24. PubMed ID: 14676741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Breech delivery and scarred uterus: a special obstetrical situation?].
Bourtembourg A; Mangin M; Ramanah R; Maillet R; Riethmuller D
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2013 Jun; 42(4):351-8. PubMed ID: 23453918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is external cephalic version at term contraindicated in previous caesarean section? A prospective comparative cohort study.
Burgos J; Cobos P; Rodríguez L; Osuna C; Centeno MM; Martínez-Astorquiza T; Fernández-Llebrez L
BJOG; 2014 Jan; 121(2):230-5; discussion 235. PubMed ID: 24245964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Secular trends in caesarean section rates over 20 years in a regional obstetric unit in Hong Kong.
Chung WH; Kong CW; To WW
Hong Kong Med J; 2017 Aug; 23(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 28684651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: predictors of success, and impact on the rate of caesarean section.
Hussin OA; Mahmoud MA; Abdel-Fattah MM
East Mediterr Health J; 2013 Feb; 19(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 23516827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prenatal risk factors for Caesarean section. Analyses of the ALSPAC cohort of 12,944 women in England.
Patel RR; Peters TJ; Murphy DJ;
Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 34(2):353-67. PubMed ID: 15659468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Planned caesarean section decreases the risk of adverse perinatal outcome due to both labour and delivery complications in the Term Breech Trial.
Su M; Hannah WJ; Willan A; Ross S; Hannah ME;
BJOG; 2004 Oct; 111(10):1065-74. PubMed ID: 15383108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Fewer breech deliveries after implementation of a modified cephalic version protocol].
Kuppens SM; Francois AM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Pop VJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A63. PubMed ID: 20132565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Term breech singletons and caesarean section: a population study, Australia 1991-2005.
Sullivan EA; Moran K; Chapman M
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Oct; 49(5):456-60. PubMed ID: 19780725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Vaginal delivery following cesarean section].
Jansen FW; van Roosmalen J; Keirse MJ; Bennebroek Gravenhorst J
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1989 Apr; 133(13):666-9. PubMed ID: 2716886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Caesarean section in the management of singleton breech delivery in Calabar, Nigeria.
Abasiattai AM; Bassey EA; Etuk SJ; Udoma EJ; Ekanem AD
Niger J Clin Pract; 2006 Jun; 9(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 16986285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of maternal and perinatal morbidity between elective and emergency caesarean section in singleton-term breech presentation.
Anuwutnavin S; Kitnithee B; Chanprapaph P; Heamar S; Rongdech P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 May; 40(4):500-506. PubMed ID: 31478414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of breech birth by mode of delivery: a population linkage study.
Bin YS; Roberts CL; Ford JB; Nicholl MC
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Oct; 56(5):453-459. PubMed ID: 27339863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomised controlled trial of magnetic-resonance pelvimetry in breech presentation at term.
van Loon AJ; Mantingh A; Serlier EK; Kroon G; Mooyaart EL; Huisjes HJ
Lancet; 1997 Dec 20-27; 350(9094):1799-804. PubMed ID: 9428250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Term breech presentation in The Netherlands from 1995 to 1999: mortality and morbidity in relation to the mode of delivery of 33824 infants.
Rietberg CC; Elferink-Stinkens PM; Brand R; van Loon AJ; Van Hemel OJ; Visser GH
BJOG; 2003 Jun; 110(6):604-9. PubMed ID: 12798480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Delivery mode and neonatal outcome after a trial of external cephalic version (ECV): a prospective trial of vaginal breech versus cephalic delivery.
Reinhard J; Sänger N; Hanker L; Reichenbach L; Yuan J; Herrmann E; Louwen F
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 287(4):663-8. PubMed ID: 23183715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Results of mostly vaginal deliveries of breech presentation].
Hofmann D; Carle-Grewe G
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1990; 112(24):1525-40. PubMed ID: 2072979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is a rising caesarean section rate inevitable?
Wilkinson C; McIlwaine G; Boulton-Jones C; Cole S
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Jan; 105(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 9442161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
