These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24848908)

  • 1. Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Nieboer TE; Aarts JWM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 123(6):1357-1358. PubMed ID: 24848908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is robotic sacrocolpopexy a marketing gimmick or a technological advancement?
    Kim JH; Anger JT
    Curr Opin Urol; 2010 Jul; 20(4):280-4. PubMed ID: 21475070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotics in gynecology: is the glass half empty or half full?
    Advincula AP
    Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 123(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 24463656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An update on surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
    McIntyre M; Goudelocke C; Rovner ES
    Curr Opin Urol; 2010 Nov; 20(6):490-4. PubMed ID: 20827209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
    Costantini E; Mearini L; Lazzeri M; Bini V; Nunzi E; di Biase M; Porena M
    J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 26780167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic/Laparoscopic prolapse repair and the role of hysteropexy: a urology perspective.
    Burgess KL; Elliott DS
    Urol Clin North Am; 2012 Aug; 39(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 22877718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Anger JT; Mueller ER; Tarnay C; Smith B; Stroupe K; Rosenman A; Brubaker L; Bresee C; Kenton K
    Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 123(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 24463657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of robotic surgery in urogynecologic surgery and radical hysterectomy: how far can we go?
    Swan K; Advincula AP
    Curr Opin Urol; 2011 Jan; 21(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 20962647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic approaches to prolapse surgery.
    Rosenblum N
    Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jul; 22(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 22647648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.
    Mueller ER; Kenton K; Anger JT; Bresee C; Tarnay C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 27180224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse, a randomized controlled trial: SALTO-2 trial, study protocol.
    Coolen AWM; van IJsselmuiden MN; van Oudheusden AMJ; Veen J; van Eijndhoven HWF; Mol BWJ; Roovers JP; Bongers MY
    BMC Womens Health; 2017 Jul; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28747206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    De Gouveia De Sa M; Claydon LS; Whitlow B; Dolcet Artahona MA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Mar; 27(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 26249235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    White WM; Pickens RB; Elder RF; Firoozi F
    Urol Clin North Am; 2014 Nov; 41(4):549-57. PubMed ID: 25306166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Re: Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Compared with Open Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy for Vault Prolapse Repair: A Randomised Controlled Trial.
    Wein AJ
    J Urol; 2020 Apr; 203(4):666-667. PubMed ID: 31928488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: with or without robotic assistance.
    Chan SS; Pang SM; Cheung TH; Cheung RY; Chung TK
    Hong Kong Med J; 2011 Feb; 17(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 21282827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Commentary on: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy compared with open abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse repair: a randomised controlled trial.
    Mowat A
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Mar; 29(3):453. PubMed ID: 29027567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Pan K; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Wang Y; Xu H
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 132(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 26797199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgical management of apical pelvic support defects: the impact of robotic technology.
    Carroll AW; Lamb E; Hill AJ; Gill EJ; Matthews CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Sep; 23(9):1183-6. PubMed ID: 22527548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.