BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24852125)

  • 41. Unhappy Patients Are Not Alike: Content Analysis of the Negative Comments from China's Good Doctor Website.
    Zhang W; Deng Z; Hong Z; Evans R; Ma J; Zhang H
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jan; 20(1):e35. PubMed ID: 29371176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Managing your online reputation.
    Segal J
    J Med Pract Manage; 2012; 27(6):341-3. PubMed ID: 22834178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Googling ourselves--what physicians can learn from online rating sites.
    Jain S
    N Engl J Med; 2010 Jan; 362(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 20054044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Exploring the Effects of Online Rating and the Activeness of Physicians on the Number of Patients in an Online Health Community.
    Li Y; Ma X; Song J; Yang Y; Ju X
    Telemed J E Health; 2019 Nov; 25(11):1090-1098. PubMed ID: 30676279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Physician-patient communication: a study on the observed behaviours of specialty physicians and the ways their patients perceive them.
    Ruiz-Moral R; Pérez Rodríguez E; Pérula de Torres LA; de la Torre J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Dec; 64(1-3):242-8. PubMed ID: 16597495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Patients' Online Perception and Ratings of Neurotologists.
    Goshtasbi K; Lehrich BM; Moshtaghi O; Abouzari M; Sahyouni R; Bagheri K; Moshtaghi A; Tajran SD; Lee L; Lin HW; Djalilian HR
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jan; 40(1):139-143. PubMed ID: 30531643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Physician Rating Scales Do Not Accurately Rate Physicians.
    Burn MB; Lintner DM; Cosculluela PE; Varner KE; Liberman SR; McCulloch PC; Harris JD
    Orthopedics; 2018 Jul; 41(4):e445-e456. PubMed ID: 29658974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The great gap. Physicians' perceptions of patient service quality expectations fall short of reality.
    O'Connor SJ; Shewchuk RM; Carney LW
    J Health Care Mark; 1994; 14(2):32-9. PubMed ID: 10137125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Patients' preferences for health-related use of Internet].
    Varga Z; Horváth T
    Orv Hetil; 2018 Dec; 159(51):2175-2182. PubMed ID: 30556412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Online physician review websites poorly correlate to a validated metric of patient satisfaction.
    Chen J; Presson A; Zhang C; Ray D; Finlayson S; Glasgow R
    J Surg Res; 2018 Jul; 227():1-6. PubMed ID: 29804840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Grading doctors online.
    Andrews M
    US News World Rep; 2008 Mar; 144(7):54. PubMed ID: 18435303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Word of mouth in the digital age: online physician ratings.
    Gillies S;
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2009 Aug; 38(8):417-9. PubMed ID: 19809607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The combined effects of participatory styles of elderly patients and their physicians on satisfaction.
    Xu KT
    Health Serv Res; 2004 Apr; 39(2):377-91. PubMed ID: 15032960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Veterans' perceptions of care by nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and physicians: a comparison from satisfaction surveys.
    Budzi D; Lurie S; Singh K; Hooker R
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2010 Mar; 22(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 20236402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Physicians' Earnings Do Not Affect Their Online Ratings.
    Haffey SC; Hopman WM; Leveridge MJ
    Front Public Health; 2020; 8():300. PubMed ID: 32733838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Online Ratings of Urologists: Comprehensive Analysis.
    Pike CW; Zillioux J; Rapp D
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jul; 21(7):e12436. PubMed ID: 31267982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Are patient-satisfaction surveys fair to doctors?
    Rice B
    Med Econ; 1996 Dec; 73(23):55-6, 59-60, 62 passim. PubMed ID: 10162659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A tale of two countries: International comparison of online doctor reviews between China and the United States.
    Hao H; Zhang K; Wang W; Gao G
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Mar; 99():37-44. PubMed ID: 28118920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. General practice consultations - how well do doctors predict patient satisfaction?
    Cannon B; Usherwood TP
    Aust Fam Physician; 2007 Mar; 36(3):185-6, 192. PubMed ID: 17339988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Why are so few patients rating their physicians on German physician rating websites? A qualitative study.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Kahrass H
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Aug; 18(1):670. PubMed ID: 30157842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.