136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24852508)
1. Transfemoral interfaces with vacuum assisted suspension comparison of gait, balance, and subjective analysis: ischial containment versus brimless.
Kahle JT; Highsmith MJ
Gait Posture; 2014 Jun; 40(2):315-20. PubMed ID: 24852508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transfemoral sockets with vacuum-assisted suspension comparison of hip kinematics, socket position, contact pressure, and preference: ischial containment versus brimless.
Kahle JT; Highsmith MJ
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(9):1241-52. PubMed ID: 24458964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vacuum-assisted socket suspension compared with pin suspension for lower extremity amputees: effect on fit, activity, and limb volume.
Klute GK; Berge JS; Biggs W; Pongnumkul S; Popovic Z; Curless B
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Oct; 92(10):1570-5. PubMed ID: 21963124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The evidence-base for elevated vacuum in lower limb prosthetics: Literature review and professional feedback.
Gholizadeh H; Lemaire ED; Eshraghi A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Aug; 37():108-116. PubMed ID: 27423025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The benefits of using a vacuum-assisted socket system to improve balance and gait in elderly transtibial amputees.
Samitier CB; Guirao L; Costea M; Camós JM; Pleguezuelos E
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 25261489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Crossover study of amputee stair ascent and descent biomechanics using Genium and C-Leg prostheses with comparison to non-amputee control.
Lura DJ; Wernke MW; Carey SL; Kahle JT; Miro RM; Highsmith MJ
Gait Posture; 2017 Oct; 58():103-107. PubMed ID: 28763712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subjective evaluations and objective measurements of the ischial-ramal containment prosthesis.
Hachisuka K; Umezu Y; Ogata H; Ohmine S; Shinkoda K; Arizono H
J UOEH; 1999 Jun; 21(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 10434359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gait and balance of transfemoral amputees using passive mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees.
Kaufman KR; Levine JA; Brey RH; Iverson BK; McCrady SK; Padgett DJ; Joyner MJ
Gait Posture; 2007 Oct; 26(4):489-93. PubMed ID: 17869114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient satisfaction following lower-limb amputation: the role of gait deviation.
Kark L; Simmons A
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 21558305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Ischial Containment and Subischial Sockets Effect on Gait Biomechanics in People With Transfemoral Amputation: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
Fatone S; Stine R; Caldwell R; Angelico J; Gard SA; Oros M; Major MJ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2022 Aug; 103(8):1515-1523. PubMed ID: 35296398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation: Part 2 Description and Preliminary evaluation.
Fatone S; Caldwell R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):246-250. PubMed ID: 28132589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study of conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in high-functioning transfemoral amputees.
Graham LE; Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J; Pros D
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 88(6):801-6. PubMed ID: 17532907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Ischial Containment and Subischial Sockets on Comfort, Function, Quality of Life, and Satisfaction With Device in Persons With Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
Fatone S; Caldwell R; Angelico J; Stine R; Kim KY; Gard S; Oros M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Nov; 102(11):2063-2073.e2. PubMed ID: 34214499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of transfemoral prosthetic socket interface design on gait, balance, mobility, and preference: A randomized clinical trial.
Kahle JT; Miro RM; Ho LT; Porter MR; Lura DJ; Carey SL; Lunseth P; Swanson AE; Highsmith MJ
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2021 Aug; 45(4):304-312. PubMed ID: 33856157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Re: Gait and balance of transfemoral amputees using passive mechanical and microprocessor controlled prosthetic knees by Kaufman et al. [Gait and Posture 20 (2007) 489-493].
Dillon M; Bach T
Gait Posture; 2009 Jan; 29(1):161-2; author reply 163-4. PubMed ID: 18722125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Transtibial amputee gait with the unity suspension system.
Gholizadeh H; Lemaire ED; Sinitski EH; Nielen D; Lebel P
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Apr; 15(3):350-356. PubMed ID: 30810420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of the transfemoral prosthetic socket interface designs on skeletal motion and socket comfort: A randomized clinical trial.
Kahle J; Miro RM; Ho LT; Porter M; Lura DJ; Carey SL; Lunseth P; Highsmith J; Highsmith MJ
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Jun; 44(3):145-154. PubMed ID: 32308126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Kinematics in the terminal swing phase of unilateral transfemoral amputees: microprocessor-controlled versus swing-phase control prosthetic knees.
Mâaref K; Martinet N; Grumillier C; Ghannouchi S; André JM; Paysant J
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Jun; 91(6):919-25. PubMed ID: 20510984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physical function, gait, and dynamic balance of transfemoral amputees using two mechanical passive prosthetic knee devices.
Lythgo N; Marmaras B; Connor H
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Oct; 91(10):1565-70. PubMed ID: 20875515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lower-limb amputee recovery response to an imposed error in mediolateral foot placement.
Segal AD; Klute GK
J Biomech; 2014 Sep; 47(12):2911-8. PubMed ID: 25145315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
