These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24853173)

  • 1. Validation of a computational docking methodology to identify the non-covalent binding site of ligands to DNA.
    Deligkaris C; Ascone AT; Sweeney KJ; Greene AJ
    Mol Biosyst; 2014 Aug; 10(8):2106-25. PubMed ID: 24853173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A vibrational entropy term for DNA docking with autodock.
    McElfresh GW; Deligkaris C
    Comput Biol Chem; 2018 Jun; 74():286-293. PubMed ID: 29698920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can We Rely on Computational Predictions To Correctly Identify Ligand Binding Sites on Novel Protein Drug Targets? Assessment of Binding Site Prediction Methods and a Protocol for Validation of Predicted Binding Sites.
    Broomhead NK; Soliman ME
    Cell Biochem Biophys; 2017 Mar; 75(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 27796788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ligand aligning method for molecular docking: alignment of property-weighted vectors.
    Joung JY; Nam KY; Cho KH; No KT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):984-95. PubMed ID: 22471323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. FDS: flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function.
    Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ; Essex JW
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12926007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A scalable and accurate method for classifying protein-ligand binding geometries using a MapReduce approach.
    Estrada T; Zhang B; Cicotti P; Armen RS; Taufer M
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jul; 42(7):758-71. PubMed ID: 22658682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. GEMDOCK: a generic evolutionary method for molecular docking.
    Yang JM; Chen CC
    Proteins; 2004 May; 55(2):288-304. PubMed ID: 15048822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Docking studies on DNA intercalators.
    Gilad Y; Senderowitz H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):96-107. PubMed ID: 24303988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CovalentDock: automated covalent docking with parameterized covalent linkage energy estimation and molecular geometry constraints.
    Ouyang X; Zhou S; Su CT; Ge Z; Li R; Kwoh CK
    J Comput Chem; 2013 Feb; 34(4):326-36. PubMed ID: 23034731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examination of shape complementarity in docking of unbound proteins.
    Norel R; Petrey D; Wolfson HJ; Nussinov R
    Proteins; 1999 Aug; 36(3):307-17. PubMed ID: 10409824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. HierVLS hierarchical docking protocol for virtual ligand screening of large-molecule databases.
    Floriano WB; Vaidehi N; Zamanakos G; Goddard WA
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(1):56-71. PubMed ID: 14695820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protein-ligand docking using mutually orthogonal Latin squares (MOLSDOCK).
    Viji SN; Prasad PA; Gautham N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Dec; 49(12):2687-94. PubMed ID: 19968302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incorporating replacement free energy of binding-site waters in molecular docking.
    Sun H; Zhao L; Peng S; Huang N
    Proteins; 2014 Sep; 82(9):1765-76. PubMed ID: 24549784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structure-based and multiple potential three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (SB-MP-3D-QSAR) for inhibitor design.
    Du QS; Gao J; Wei YT; Du LQ; Wang SQ; Huang RB
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):996-1004. PubMed ID: 22480344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions.
    Halperin I; Ma B; Wolfson H; Nussinov R
    Proteins; 2002 Jun; 47(4):409-43. PubMed ID: 12001221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protein-ligand-based pharmacophores: generation and utility assessment in computational ligand profiling.
    Meslamani J; Li J; Sutter J; Stevens A; Bertrand HO; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):943-55. PubMed ID: 22480372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational method to identify druggable binding sites that target protein-protein interactions.
    Li H; Kasam V; Tautermann CS; Seeliger D; Vaidehi N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 May; 54(5):1391-400. PubMed ID: 24762202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binding affinity prediction for protein-ligand complexes based on β contacts and B factor.
    Liu Q; Kwoh CK; Li J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3076-85. PubMed ID: 24191692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methods for predicting protein-ligand binding sites.
    Xie ZR; Hwang MJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1215():383-98. PubMed ID: 25330972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Knowledge-based scoring functions in drug design: 3. A two-dimensional knowledge-based hydrogen-bonding potential for the prediction of protein-ligand interactions.
    Zheng M; Xiong B; Luo C; Li S; Liu X; Shen Q; Li J; Zhu W; Luo X; Jiang H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Nov; 51(11):2994-3004. PubMed ID: 21999432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.