BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

474 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24853490)

  • 1. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes following unsuccessful external cephalic version: a stratified analysis amongst failures, successes, and controls.
    Balayla J; Dahdouh EM; Villeneuve S; Boucher M; Gauthier RJ; Audibert F; Fuchs F
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Mar; 28(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 24853490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and efficacy of external cephalic version for women with a previous cesarean delivery.
    Sela HY; Fiegenberg T; Ben-Meir A; Elchalal U; Ezra Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Feb; 142(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 19019528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uptake of external cephalic version for term breech presentation: an Australian population study, 2002-2012.
    Bin YS; Roberts CL; Nicholl MC; Ford JB
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jul; 17(1):244. PubMed ID: 28747173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Fetomaternal Outcome between 47 Deliveries Following Successful External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation and 7456 Deliveries Following Spontaneous Cephalic Presentation.
    de Gregorio N; Friedl T; Schramm A; Reister F; Janni W; Ebner F
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(5):477-481. PubMed ID: 28848185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes after successful external cephalic version relative to those after spontaneous cephalic presentations.
    Chevreau J; Foulon A; Beuvin E; Gondry J; Sergent F
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 49(4):101693. PubMed ID: 31978624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following successful external cephalic version.
    Basu A; Flatley C; Kumar S
    J Perinatol; 2016 Jun; 36(6):439-42. PubMed ID: 26796127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Delivery outcomes in subsequent pregnancy following primary breech cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study.
    Eden-Friedman Y; Ginosar Y; Sela HY; Calderon-Margalit R; Eventov-Friedman S; Ezra Y; Weiniger CF
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 May; 33(9):1554-1560. PubMed ID: 30207183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Impact of an ECV Service is Limited by Antenatal Breech Detection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Hemelaar J; Lim LN; Impey LW
    Birth; 2015 Jun; 42(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 25872703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Successful external cephalic version is an independent factor for caesarean section during trial of labor - a matched controlled study.
    Boujenah J; Fleury C; Bonneau C; Pharisien I; Tigaizin A; Carbillon L
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Dec; 46(10):737-742. PubMed ID: 28951278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Impact of the external cephalic version on the obstetrical prognosis in a team with a high success rate of vaginal delivery in breech presentation].
    Coppola C; Mottet N; Mariet AS; Baeza C; Poitrey E; Bourtembourg A; Ramanah R; Riethmuller D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Oct; 45(8):859-865. PubMed ID: 27125381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Delivery mode and neonatal outcome after a trial of external cephalic version (ECV): a prospective trial of vaginal breech versus cephalic delivery.
    Reinhard J; Sänger N; Hanker L; Reichenbach L; Yuan J; Herrmann E; Louwen F
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 287(4):663-8. PubMed ID: 23183715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Cord accident after external cephalic version: Reality or mostly myth?].
    Boujenah J; Fleury C; Pharisien I; Benbara A; Tigaizin A; Bricou A; Carbillon L
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Jan; 45(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 28238321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Value of routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation in diagnosis of non-cephalic presentation.
    De Castro H; Ciobanu A; Formuso C; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):248-256. PubMed ID: 31671470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical outcomes after external cephalic version with spinal anesthesia after failure of a first attempt without anesthesia.
    Massalha M; Garmi G; Zafran N; Carmeli J; Gimburg G; Salim R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Dec; 139(3):324-328. PubMed ID: 28842977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maternal outcomes of term breech presentation delivery: impact of successful external cephalic version in a nationwide sample of delivery admissions in the United States.
    Weiniger CF; Lyell DJ; Tsen LC; Butwick AJ; Shachar B; Callaghan WM; Creanga AA; Bateman BT
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Jul; 16(1):150. PubMed ID: 27392035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maternal and perinatal outcomes in external cephalic version: prognostic factors for the success of the technique.
    Trobo D; Pintado P; Ortega V; Yllana F; Hernández C; Mendizábal R; De León-Luis J
    J Perinat Med; 2019 Sep; 47(7):717-723. PubMed ID: 31369397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Matched cohort study of external cephalic version in women with previous cesarean delivery.
    Keepanasseril A; Anand K; Soundara Raghavan S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jul; 138(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 28380246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. External cephalic version at term: a cohort study of 18 years' experience.
    Melo P; Georgiou EX; Hedditch A; Ellaway P; Impey L
    BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 30223309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Fewer breech deliveries after implementation of a modified cephalic version protocol].
    Kuppens SM; Francois AM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Pop VJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A63. PubMed ID: 20132565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Successful but limited use of external cephalic version in Auckland.
    Wise MR; Sadler L; Ansell D
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 19032661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.