377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24853490)
21. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term.
Hofmeyr GJ; Kulier R; West HM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Apr; 2015(4):CD000083. PubMed ID: 25828903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term.
Hofmeyr GJ; Kulier R
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Oct; 10():CD000083. PubMed ID: 23076883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [External cephalic version in case of persisting breech presentation at term: motivations and women's experience of the intervention].
Pichon M; Guittier MJ; Irion O; Boulvain M
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2013; 41(7-8):427-32. PubMed ID: 23102577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Oral nifepidine versus subcutaneous terbutaline tocolysis for external cephalic version: a double-blind randomised trial.
Collaris R; Tan PC
BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(1):74-80; discussion 80-1. PubMed ID: 19087079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Randomized trial of anaesthetic interventions in external cephalic version for breech presentation.
Khaw KS; Lee SW; Ngan Kee WD; Law LW; Lau TK; Ng FF; Leung TY
Br J Anaesth; 2015 Jun; 114(6):944-50. PubMed ID: 25962611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cost-effectiveness of external cephalic version for term breech presentation.
Tan JM; Macario A; Carvalho B; Druzin ML; El-Sayed YY
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2010 Jan; 10():3. PubMed ID: 20092630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Factors influencing the effect of external cephalic version: a retrospective nationwide cohort analysis.
Londero AP; Xholli A; Massarotti C; Fruscalzo A; Cagnacci A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Oct; 308(4):1127-1137. PubMed ID: 36068364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Implementation of the external cephalic version in breech delivery. Dutch national implementation study of external cephalic version.
Vlemmix F; Rosman AN; Fleuren MA; Rijnders ME; Beuckens A; Haak MC; Akerboom BM; Bais JM; Kuppens SM; Papatsonis DN; Opmeer BC; van der Post JA; Mol BW; Kok M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2010 May; 10():20. PubMed ID: 20459717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Efficacy of a second external cephalic version (ECV) after a successful first external cephalic version with subsequent spontaneous reinversion to breech presentation: a retrospective cohort study.
Reicher L; Lavie A; Fouks Y; Isakov O; Attali E; Yogev Y; Maslovitz S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 303(4):911-916. PubMed ID: 33025088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. External cephalic version beginning at 34 weeks' gestation versus 37 weeks' gestation: a randomized multicenter trial.
Hutton EK; Kaufman K; Hodnett E; Amankwah K; Hewson SA; McKay D; Szalai JP; Hannah ME
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 189(1):245-54. PubMed ID: 12861170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Tocolysis for repeat external cephalic version in breech presentation at term: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.
Impey L; Pandit M
BJOG; 2005 May; 112(5):627-31. PubMed ID: 15842288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. External cephalic version with salbutamol - success rate and predictors of success.
Tasnim N; Mahmud G; Khurshid M
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2009 Feb; 19(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 19208311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Route of delivery following successful external cephalic version.
Policiano C; Costa A; Valentim-Lourenço A; Clode N; Graça LM
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 126(3):272-4. PubMed ID: 24890743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Short Text].
Sentilhes L; Schmitz T; Azria E; Gallot D; Ducarme G; Korb D; Mattuizzi A; Parant O; Sananès N; Baumann S; Rozenberg P; Senat MV; Verspyck É
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Jan; 48(1):63-69. PubMed ID: 31678505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Outcome of external cephalic version after 36 weeks' gestation without tocolysis.
Impey L; Lissoni D
J Matern Fetal Med; 1999; 8(5):203-7. PubMed ID: 10475501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Association between hospitals' cesarean delivery rates for breech presentation and their success rates for external cephalic version.
Athiel Y; Girault A; Le Ray C; Goffinet F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Mar; 270():156-163. PubMed ID: 35063899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ultrasound factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis.
Kok M; Cnossen J; Gravendeel L; Van Der Post JA; Mol BW
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jan; 33(1):76-84. PubMed ID: 19115237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Fetal version as ambulatory intervention].
Nohe G; Hartmann W; Klapproth CE
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1996 Jun; 56(6):328-30. PubMed ID: 8766492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [External fetal version from breech presentation to cephalic presentation: modifying factors, reliability and risks].
Flock F; Stoz F; Paulus W; Scheurle B; Kreienberg R
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1998; 120(2):60-5. PubMed ID: 9531707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Use of external cephalic version for breech pregnancy and mode of delivery for breech and twin pregnancy: a survey of Canadian practitioners.
Hutton EK; Hannah ME; Barrett J
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2002 Oct; 24(10):804-10. PubMed ID: 12399807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
