These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24853630)

  • 21. Action co-representation and the sense of agency during a joint Simon task: Comparing human and machine co-agents.
    Sahaï A; Desantis A; Grynszpan O; Pacherie E; Berberian B
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 Jan; 67():44-55. PubMed ID: 30522081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The development of action planning in a joint action context.
    Paulus M
    Dev Psychol; 2016 Jul; 52(7):1052-63. PubMed ID: 27337512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Facilitation effect of observed motor deviants in a cooperative motor task: Evidence for direct perception of social intention in action.
    Quesque F; Delevoye-Turrell Y; Coello Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(8):1451-63. PubMed ID: 26288247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sharing tasks or sharing actions? Evidence from the joint Simon task.
    Yamaguchi M; Wall HJ; Hommel B
    Psychol Res; 2018 Mar; 82(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 27826655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development of interpersonal coordination between peers during a drumming task.
    Endedijk HM; Ramenzoni VC; Cox RF; Cillessen AH; Bekkering H; Hunnius S
    Dev Psychol; 2015 May; 51(5):714-21. PubMed ID: 25775110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Planning my actions to accommodate yours: joint action development during early childhood.
    Meyer M; van der Wel RP; Hunnius S
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2016 May; 371(1693):. PubMed ID: 27069048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Intentionality of a co-actor influences sensorimotor synchronisation with a virtual partner.
    Mills PF; Harry B; Stevens CJ; Knoblich G; Keller PE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1478-1492. PubMed ID: 30081732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Co-actors represent the order of each other's actions.
    Schmitz L; Vesper C; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Cognition; 2018 Dec; 181():65-79. PubMed ID: 30142512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Our actions in my mind: motor imagery of joint action.
    Vesper C; Knoblich G; Sebanz N
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Mar; 55():115-21. PubMed ID: 23751170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How do partner reactions affect task set selection: Specific imitation or abstract tasks?
    Müller R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Nov; 73(11):2008-2025. PubMed ID: 32530365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. When task sharing reduces interference: evidence for division-of-labour in Stroop-like tasks.
    Sellaro R; Treccani B; Cubelli R
    Psychol Res; 2020 Mar; 84(2):327-342. PubMed ID: 29971545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Motion coordination affects movement parameters in a joint pick-and-place task.
    Vesper C; Soutschek A; Schubo A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2418-32. PubMed ID: 19499488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Joint action goals reduce visuomotor interference effects from a partner's incongruent actions.
    Clarke S; McEllin L; Francová A; Székely M; Butterfill SA; Michael J
    Sci Rep; 2019 Oct; 9(1):15414. PubMed ID: 31659223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of stimulus--response assignment on the joint-action correspondence effect.
    Lam MY; Chua R
    Psychol Res; 2010 Sep; 74(5):476-80. PubMed ID: 20043175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of a coactor's focus of attention on task performance.
    Böckler A; Knoblich G; Sebanz N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Dec; 38(6):1404-15. PubMed ID: 22409143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Are you ready to jump? Predictive mechanisms in interpersonal coordination.
    Vesper C; van der Wel RP; Knoblich G; Sebanz N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):48-61. PubMed ID: 22564161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Entrainment and task co-representation effects for discrete and continuous action sequences.
    van der Wel RP; Fu E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1685-91. PubMed ID: 25911443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Action co-representation: the joint SNARC effect.
    Atmaca S; Sebanz N; Prinz W; Knoblich G
    Soc Neurosci; 2008; 3(3-4):410-20. PubMed ID: 18633833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Response-repetition effects in task switching with and without response execution.
    Schuch S; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 20719288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The contextual cueing effect disappears during joint search in preschool children.
    Sakata C; Ueda Y; Moriguchi Y
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2023 Mar; 227():105592. PubMed ID: 36442326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.