These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Toward high-resolution prediction and design of transmembrane helical protein structures. Barth P; Schonbrun J; Baker D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Oct; 104(40):15682-7. PubMed ID: 17905872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evolutionary-guided de novo structure prediction of self-associated transmembrane helical proteins with near-atomic accuracy. Wang Y; Barth P Nat Commun; 2015 May; 6():7196. PubMed ID: 25995083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SuperBiHelix method for predicting the pleiotropic ensemble of G-protein-coupled receptor conformations. Bray JK; Abrol R; Goddard WA; Trzaskowski B; Scott CE Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jan; 111(1):E72-8. PubMed ID: 24344284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. X-ray structure breakthroughs in the GPCR transmembrane region. Topiol S; Sabio M Biochem Pharmacol; 2009 Jul; 78(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 19447219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimized method of G-protein-coupled receptor homology modeling: its application to the discovery of novel CXCR7 ligands. Yoshikawa Y; Oishi S; Kubo T; Tanahara N; Fujii N; Furuya T J Med Chem; 2013 Jun; 56(11):4236-51. PubMed ID: 23656360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. GPCR homology model template selection benchmarking: Global versus local similarity measures. Castleman PN; Sears CK; Cole JA; Baker DL; Parrill AL J Mol Graph Model; 2019 Jan; 86():235-246. PubMed ID: 30390544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of the transmembrane domain structures in GPCR Dock 2013 models. Wang T; Liu H; Duan Y J Struct Biol; 2018 Mar; 201(3):210-220. PubMed ID: 29174398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Integrating Pharmacophore into Membrane Molecular Dynamics Simulations to Improve Homology Modeling of G Protein-coupled Receptors with Ligand Selectivity: A2A Adenosine Receptor as an Example. Zeng L; Guan M; Jin H; Liu Z; Zhang L Chem Biol Drug Des; 2015 Dec; 86(6):1438-50. PubMed ID: 26072970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Towards improved quality of GPCR models by usage of multiple templates and profile-profile comparison. Latek D; Pasznik P; Carlomagno T; Filipek S PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e56742. PubMed ID: 23468878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Structure prediction of helical transmembrane proteins at two length scales. Chen Z; Xu Y J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2006 Apr; 4(2):317-33. PubMed ID: 16819786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Topology Prediction Improvement of α-helical Transmembrane Proteins Through Helix-tail Modeling and Multiscale Deep Learning Fusion. Feng SH; Zhang WX; Yang J; Yang Y; Shen HB J Mol Biol; 2020 Feb; 432(4):1279-1296. PubMed ID: 31870850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Novel approaches for targeting the adenosine A2A receptor. Yuan G; Gedeon NG; Jankins TC; Jones GB Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2015 Jan; 10(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 25311639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Alternative quality assessment strategy to compare performances of GPCR-ligand docking protocols: the human adenosine A(2A) receptor as a case study. Ciancetta A; Cuzzolin A; Moro S J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Aug; 54(8):2243-54. PubMed ID: 25046649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accurate Prediction of Contact Numbers for Multi-Spanning Helical Membrane Proteins. Li B; Mendenhall J; Nguyen ED; Weiner BE; Fischer AW; Meiler J J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Feb; 56(2):423-34. PubMed ID: 26804342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]