These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24855333)
1. Assignment of Calibration Information to Deeper Phylogenetic Nodes is More Effective in Obtaining Precise and Accurate Divergence Time Estimates. Mello B; Schrago CG Evol Bioinform Online; 2014; 10():79-85. PubMed ID: 24855333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Potential for bias and low precision in molecular divergence time estimation of the Canopy of Life: an example from aquatic bird families. van Tuinen M; Torres CR Front Genet; 2015; 6():203. PubMed ID: 26106406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Data-driven speciation tree prior for better species divergence times in calibration-poor molecular phylogenies. Tao Q; Barba-Montoya J; Kumar S Bioinformatics; 2021 Jul; 37(Suppl_1):i102-i110. PubMed ID: 34252953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of the uncertainty of divergence time estimation under relaxed molecular clock models using multiple loci. Zhu T; Dos Reis M; Yang Z Syst Biol; 2015 Mar; 64(2):267-80. PubMed ID: 25503979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Testing the impact of calibration on molecular divergence times using a fossil-rich group: the case of Nothofagus (Fagales). Sauquet H; Ho SY; Gandolfo MA; Jordan GJ; Wilf P; Cantrill DJ; Bayly MJ; Bromham L; Brown GK; Carpenter RJ; Lee DM; Murphy DJ; Sniderman JM; Udovicic F Syst Biol; 2012 Mar; 61(2):289-313. PubMed ID: 22201158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of different strategies for using fossil calibrations to generate the time prior in Bayesian molecular clock dating. Barba-Montoya J; Dos Reis M; Yang Z Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2017 Sep; 114():386-400. PubMed ID: 28709986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An evaluation of fossil tip-dating versus node-age calibrations in tetraodontiform fishes (Teleostei: Percomorphaceae). Arcila D; Alexander Pyron R; Tyler JC; Ortí G; Betancur-R R Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2015 Jan; 82 Pt A():131-45. PubMed ID: 25462998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methods for the quantitative comparison of molecular estimates of clade age and the fossil record. Clarke JA; Boyd CA Syst Biol; 2015 Jan; 64(1):25-41. PubMed ID: 25281846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Strategies for Partitioning Clock Models in Phylogenomic Dating: Application to the Angiosperm Evolutionary Timescale. Foster CSP; Ho SYW Genome Biol Evol; 2017 Oct; 9(10):2752-2763. PubMed ID: 29036288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Branch length estimation and divergence dating: estimates of error in Bayesian and maximum likelihood frameworks. Schwartz RS; Mueller RL BMC Evol Biol; 2010 Jan; 10():5. PubMed ID: 20064267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of taxon sampling and tree shape on molecular dating: an empirical example from Mammalian mitochondrial genomes. Soares AE; Schrago CG Bioinform Biol Insights; 2012; 6():129-43. PubMed ID: 22693422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The fossilized birth-death process for coherent calibration of divergence-time estimates. Heath TA; Huelsenbeck JP; Stadler T Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jul; 111(29):E2957-66. PubMed ID: 25009181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Evaluation of Different Partitioning Strategies for Bayesian Estimation of Species Divergence Times. Angelis K; Álvarez-Carretero S; Dos Reis M; Yang Z Syst Biol; 2018 Jan; 67(1):61-77. PubMed ID: 29029343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When did anoles diverge? An analysis of multiple dating strategies. Román-Palacios C; Tavera J; Castañeda MDR Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2018 Oct; 127():655-668. PubMed ID: 29906605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of calibration and clock-model choice on molecular estimates of divergence times. Duchêne S; Lanfear R; Ho SY Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Sep; 78():277-89. PubMed ID: 24910154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Past Sure is Tense: On Interpreting Phylogenetic Divergence Time Estimates. Brown JW; Smith SA Syst Biol; 2018 Mar; 67(2):340-353. PubMed ID: 28945912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of taxon sampling on Bayesian divergence time inference under scenarios of rate heterogeneity among lineages. Soares AE; Schrago CG J Theor Biol; 2015 Jan; 364():31-9. PubMed ID: 25218869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tips and nodes are complementary not competing approaches to the calibration of molecular clocks. O'Reilly JE; Donoghue PC Biol Lett; 2016 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 27095263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A hierarchical Bayesian model for calibrating estimates of species divergence times. Heath TA Syst Biol; 2012 Oct; 61(5):793-809. PubMed ID: 22334343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]