161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24856211)
61. Variable predation regimes predict the evolution of sexual dimorphism in a population of threespine stickleback.
Reimchen TE; Nosil P
Evolution; 2004 Jun; 58(6):1274-81. PubMed ID: 15266976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Longer or shorter spines: Reciprocal trait evolution in stickleback via triallelic regulatory changes in
Roberts Kingman GA; Lee D; Jones FC; Desmet D; Bell MA; Kingsley DM
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Aug; 118(31):. PubMed ID: 34321354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Diversification and adaptive evolution of putative sweet taste receptors in threespine stickleback.
Hashiguchi Y; Furuta Y; Kawahara R; Nishida M
Gene; 2007 Jul; 396(1):170-9. PubMed ID: 17467198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Reductions in prolonged swimming capacity following freshwater colonization in multiple threespine stickleback populations.
Dalziel AC; Vines TH; Schulte PM
Evolution; 2012 Apr; 66(4):1226-39. PubMed ID: 22486700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Character shifts in the defensive armor of sympatric sticklebacks.
Vamosi SM; Schluter D
Evolution; 2004 Feb; 58(2):376-85. PubMed ID: 15068354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. A high incidence of selection on physiologically important genes in the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus.
Shimada Y; Shikano T; Merilä J
Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Jan; 28(1):181-93. PubMed ID: 20660084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Parallel genetic basis for repeated evolution of armor loss in Alaskan threespine stickleback populations.
Cresko WA; Amores A; Wilson C; Murphy J; Currey M; Phillips P; Bell MA; Kimmel CB; Postlethwait JH
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Apr; 101(16):6050-5. PubMed ID: 15069186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Experimental confirmation that body size determines mate preference via phenotype matching in a stickleback species pair.
Conte GL; Schluter D
Evolution; 2013 May; 67(5):1477-84. PubMed ID: 23617922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Evolution of growth by genetic accommodation in Icelandic freshwater stickleback.
Robinson BW
Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Dec; 280(1772):20132197. PubMed ID: 24132309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Genetic signature of adaptive peak shift in threespine stickleback.
Rogers SM; Tamkee P; Summers B; Balabahadra S; Marks M; Kingsley DM; Schluter D
Evolution; 2012 Aug; 66(8):2439-50. PubMed ID: 22834743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. When maladaptive gene flow does not increase selection.
Rolshausen G; Muttalib S; Kaeuffer R; Oke KB; Hanson D; Hendry AP
Evolution; 2015 Sep; 69(9):2289-302. PubMed ID: 26222781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Adaptation in temporally variable environments: stickleback armor in periodically breaching bar-built estuaries.
Paccard A; Wasserman BA; Hanson D; Astorg L; Durston D; Kurland S; Apgar TM; El-Sabaawi RW; Palkovacs EP; Hendry AP; Barrett RDH
J Evol Biol; 2018 May; 31(5):735-752. PubMed ID: 29532568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Evolution toward a new adaptive optimum: phenotypic evolution in a fossil stickleback lineage.
Hunt G; Bell MA; Travis MP
Evolution; 2008 Mar; 62(3):700-10. PubMed ID: 18081713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. The genetics of adaptive shape shift in stickleback: pleiotropy and effect size.
Albert AY; Sawaya S; Vines TH; Knecht AK; Miller CT; Summers BR; Balabhadra S; Kingsley DM; Schluter D
Evolution; 2008 Jan; 62(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 18005154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Genetic and developmental basis of evolutionary pelvic reduction in threespine sticklebacks.
Shapiro MD; Marks ME; Peichel CL; Blackman BK; Nereng KS; Jónsson B; Schluter D; Kingsley DM
Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6984):717-23. PubMed ID: 15085123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Ontogenetic and evolutionary effects of predation and competition on nine-spined stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) body size.
Välimäki K; Herczeg G
J Anim Ecol; 2012 Jul; 81(4):859-67. PubMed ID: 22448742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Resource diversity promotes among-individual diet variation, but not genomic diversity, in lake stickleback.
Bolnick DI; Ballare KM
Ecol Lett; 2020 Mar; 23(3):495-505. PubMed ID: 31919988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Relaxed selection in the wild.
Lahti DC; Johnson NA; Ajie BC; Otto SP; Hendry AP; Blumstein DT; Coss RG; Donohue K; Foster SA
Trends Ecol Evol; 2009 Sep; 24(9):487-96. PubMed ID: 19500875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. On the origin of species by natural and sexual selection.
van Doorn GS; Edelaar P; Weissing FJ
Science; 2009 Dec; 326(5960):1704-7. PubMed ID: 19965377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. The maintenance of standing genetic variation: Gene flow vs. selective neutrality in Atlantic stickleback fish.
Haenel Q; Guerard L; MacColl ADC; Berner D
Mol Ecol; 2022 Feb; 31(3):811-821. PubMed ID: 34753205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
