BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24856651)

  • 21. Randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Porpiglia F; Morra I; Lucci Chiarissi M; Manfredi M; Mele F; Grande S; Ragni F; Poggio M; Fiori C
    Eur Urol; 2013 Apr; 63(4):606-14. PubMed ID: 22840353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes between standard laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
    Huang X; Wang L; Zheng X; Wang X
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Mar; 31(3):1045-1060. PubMed ID: 27444830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Continence, potency and oncological outcomes after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: early trifecta results of a high-volume surgeon.
    Patel VR; Coelho RF; Chauhan S; Orvieto MA; Palmer KJ; Rocco B; Sivaraman A; Coughlin G
    BJU Int; 2010 Sep; 106(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 20707793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in 2013.
    Ali A; Nguyen DP; Tewari A
    Minerva Chir; 2013 Oct; 68(5):499-512. PubMed ID: 24101007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Detrusorrhaphy and Intrafascial Nerve-Sparing During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy on Recovery of Continence and Potency: Surgical Feasibility, One-Year Functional and Oncologic Outcomes.
    Lee YS; Shin TY
    Urol J; 2020 Jul; 18(3):314-321. PubMed ID: 32715457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.
    Murphy DG; Kerger M; Crowe H; Peters JS; Costello AJ
    Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1358-66. PubMed ID: 19147274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Comparison of functional outcomes after retropubic and robot-assisted radical nerve-sparing prostatectomy conducted by surgeons with total caseloads of over 1000 prostatectomies].
    Pushkar DY; Dyakov VV; Vasilyev AO; Kotenko DV
    Urologiia; 2017 Apr; (1):50-53. PubMed ID: 28394523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Retrograde Release of the Neurovascular Bundle with Preservation of Dorsal Venous Complex During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Optimizing Functional Outcomes.
    de Carvalho PA; Barbosa JABA; Guglielmetti GB; Cordeiro MD; Rocco B; Nahas WC; Patel V; Coelho RF
    Eur Urol; 2020 May; 77(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 30041833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Oncologic results, functional outcomes, and complication rates of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: multicenter experience in Turkey including 1,499 patients.
    Tasci AI; Tufek I; Gumus E; Canda AE; Tugcu V; Atug F; Boylu U; Akbulut Z; Sahin S; Simsek A; Kural AR
    World J Urol; 2015 Aug; 33(8):1095-102. PubMed ID: 25216924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Nerve-sparing in salvage robot-assisted prostatectomy: surgical technique, oncological and functional outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
    Bonet X; Ogaya-Pinies G; Woodlief T; Hernandez-Cardona E; Ganapathi H; Rogers T; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Vigués F; Patel V
    BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):837-844. PubMed ID: 30126045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation.
    Zorn KC; Gofrit ON; Orvieto MA; Mikhail AA; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL
    Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):755-62; discussion 763. PubMed ID: 17084520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparisons of the perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes after robot-assisted versus pure extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Ploussard G; de la Taille A; Moulin M; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; Salomon L
    Eur Urol; 2014 Mar; 65(3):610-9. PubMed ID: 23245815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How to optimize patient selection for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: functional outcome analyses from a tertiary referral center.
    Gandaglia G; Suardi N; Gallina A; Zaffuto E; Cucchiara V; Vizziello D; Shariat S; Cantiello F; Damiano R; Guazzoni G; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    J Endourol; 2014 Jul; 28(7):792-800. PubMed ID: 24660774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Oncological and functional results of antegrade radical retropubic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer.
    Carini M; Masieri L; Minervini A; Lapini A; Serni S
    Eur Urol; 2008 Mar; 53(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 17683854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Can nerve monitoring during radical prostatectomy improve functional outcomes? A randomised trial.
    Nolsøe AB; Østergren PB; Jakobsen H; Jensen CFS; Bruun NH; Sønksen J; Fode M
    BJU Int; 2024 Jun; 133(6):742-751. PubMed ID: 38348547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of a risk-stratified grade of nerve-sparing technique on early return of continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Srivastava A; Chopra S; Pham A; Sooriakumaran P; Durand M; Chughtai B; Gruschow S; Peyser A; Harneja N; Leung R; Lee R; Herman M; Robinson B; Shevchuk M; Tewari A
    Eur Urol; 2013 Mar; 63(3):438-44. PubMed ID: 22901982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Endopelvic fascia preservation during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does it affect urinary incontinence?
    Kwon SY; Lee JN; Kim HT; Kim TH; Kim BW; Choi GS; Kwon TG
    Scand J Urol; 2014 Dec; 48(6):506-12. PubMed ID: 25008957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Retzius-sparing Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Facilitates Early Continence Regardless of Neurovascular Bundle Sparing.
    Liao PC; Hung SC; Hu JC; Chiu KY
    Anticancer Res; 2020 Jul; 40(7):4075-4080. PubMed ID: 32620655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Do we need the nerve sparing radical prostatectomy techniques (intrafascial vs. interfascial) in men with erectile dysfunction? Results of a single-centre study.
    Khoder WY; Waidelich R; Seitz M; Becker AJ; Buchner A; Trittschler S; Stief CG
    World J Urol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 24752607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Full Neurovascular Sparing Extraperitoneal Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Our Experience with PERUSIA Technique.
    Cochetti G; Boni A; Barillaro F; Pohja S; Cirocchi R; Mearini E
    J Endourol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):32-37. PubMed ID: 27824258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.