These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24856841)

  • 1. Comparison of lead and tin concentrations in air at a solder manufacturer from the closed-face 37-mm cassette with and without a custom cellulose-acetate cassette insert.
    Lee EG; Chisholm WP; Burns DA; Nelson JH; Kashon ML; Harper M
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2014; 11(12):819-25. PubMed ID: 24856841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of X-ray fluorescence and wet chemical analysis for lead on air filters from different personal samplers used in a secondary lead smelter/solder manufacturer.
    Harper M; Pacolay B
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Jan; 8(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 16395471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of portable XRF and ICP-OES analysis for lead on air filter samples from a lead ore concentrator mill and a lead-acid battery recycler.
    Harper M; Pacolay B; Hintz P; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Mar; 8(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 16528423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of X-ray fluorescence and wet chemical analysis of air filter samples from a scrap lead smelting operation.
    Harper M; Hallmark TS; Andrew ME; Bird AJ
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Oct; 6(10):819-26. PubMed ID: 15480496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a Wipe Method With and Without a Rinse to Recover Wall Losses in Closed Face 37-mm Cassettes used for Sampling Lead Dust Particulates.
    Ceballos D; King B; Beaucham C; Brueck SE
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(10):D225-31. PubMed ID: 26125330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of X-ray fluorescence and wet chemical analysis for lead on air filters from different personal samplers used in a bronze foundry.
    Harper M; Pacolay B; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2005 Jun; 7(6):592-7. PubMed ID: 15931420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Site comparison of selected aerosol samplers in the wood industry.
    Kauffer E; Wrobel R; Görner P; Rott C; Grzebyk M; Simon X; Witschger O
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):188-203. PubMed ID: 20044585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acid-soluble internal capsules for closed-face cassette elemental sampling and analysis of workplace air.
    Harper M; Ashley K
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(6):297-306. PubMed ID: 23548078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Portable XRF analysis of occupational air filter samples from different workplaces using different samplers: final results, summary and conclusions.
    Harper M; Pacolay B; Hintz P; Bartley DL; Slaven JE; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Nov; 9(11):1263-70. PubMed ID: 17968454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a 25-mm disposable sampler relative to the inhalable aerosol convention.
    Borsh FB; Sleeth DK; Handy RG; Pahler LF; Andrews R; Ashley K
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2019 Sep; 16(9):634-642. PubMed ID: 31298629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Closed-face filter cassette (CFC) sampling-guidance on procedures for inclusion of material adhering to internal sampler surfaces.
    Ashley K; Harper M
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(3):D29-33. PubMed ID: 23339418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Simple and Disposable Sampler for Inhalable Aerosol.
    L'Orange C; Anderson K; Sleeth D; Anthony TR; Volckens J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Mar; 60(2):150-60. PubMed ID: 26467335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laboratory study of selected personal inhalable aerosol samplers.
    Görner P; Simon X; Wrobel R; Kauffer E; Witschger O
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):165-87. PubMed ID: 20147627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigation of particle transfer to sampler covers during the transportation of samples.
    Erekaife G; Park HD; Kashon ML; Chisholm WP; Lee EG
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2021 Jul; 18(7):295-304. PubMed ID: 34129437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the closed-face cassette at different orientations while measuring total particles.
    Cook DM; Sleeth DK; Thiese MS; Larson RR
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 25337937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of wood-dust aerosol size-distributions collected by air samplers.
    Harper M; Akbar MZ; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Jan; 6(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 14737465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of prototype high-flow inhalable dust sampler in a livestock production facility.
    Anthony TR; Cai C; Mehaffy J; Sleeth D; Volckens J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 May; 14(5):313-322. PubMed ID: 27792469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intersampler field comparison of Respicon(R), IOM, and closed-face 25-mm personal aerosol samplers during primary production of aluminium.
    Skaugset NP; Ellingsen DG; Notø H; Jordbekken L; Thomassen Y
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Oct; 57(8):1054-64. PubMed ID: 23792971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A headset-mounted mini sampler for measuring exposure to welding aerosol in the breathing zone.
    Lidén G; Surakka J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Mar; 53(2):99-116. PubMed ID: 19196747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.