188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24857444)
1. Refractive surgical problem: June consultation #1.
Santhiago MR
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1048-50. PubMed ID: 24857444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. September consultation: Refractive surgical problem.
Yoo SH
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Sep; 36(9):1613-8. PubMed ID: 20692582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Refractive Surgical Problem: September consultation #1.
Nuijts RM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1445-6. PubMed ID: 23988245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Consultation Section: Refractive. Consecutive hyperopia after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis.
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Mar; 46(3):485-490. PubMed ID: 32142046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Refractive surgical problem: November consultation.
Maloney RK; Malyugin B; Knorz MC; Masket S; Fram NR
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Nov; 38(11):2055-7. PubMed ID: 23079325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Consultation section: refractive surgical problem.
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):800-3. PubMed ID: 19393873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Conductive keratoplasty to treat hyperopic overcorrection after LASIK for myopia.
Chang JS; Lau SY
J Refract Surg; 2011 Jan; 27(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 20166620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratome for hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis.
Gil-Cazorla R; Teus MA; de Benito-Llopis L; Mikropoulos DG
Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Jul; 152(1):16-21.e2. PubMed ID: 21507378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consultation section: refractive surgical problem.
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Sep; 30(9):1827-31. PubMed ID: 15342038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Refractive Surgical Question: September consultation #1.
Nuijts RM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1571-2; discussion 1575. PubMed ID: 25135554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Corneal aberrations and objective visual quality after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis using the Esiris excimer laser.
Alió JL; Piñero DP; Espinosa MJ; Corral MJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Mar; 34(3):398-406. PubMed ID: 18299063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consultation section. Refractive surgical problem.
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2001 Sep; 27(9):1348-55. PubMed ID: 11579917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Consultation section. Hyperopic LASIK.
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2001 May; 27(5):653-8. PubMed ID: 11377890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Refractive, topographic, and visual effects of flap amputation following laser in situ keratomileusis.
McLeod SD; Holsclaw D; Lee S
Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1213-7. PubMed ID: 12215100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Sources of medical error in refractive surgery.
Moshirfar M; Simpson RG; Dave SB; Christiansen SM; Edmonds JN; Culbertson WW; Pascucci SE; Sher NA; Cano DB; Trattler WB
J Refract Surg; 2013 May; 29(5):303-10. PubMed ID: 23659228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Consultation section: refractive surgical problem.
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1734-7. PubMed ID: 21855773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Recentration of a small-aperture corneal inlay.
Gatinel D; El Danasoury A; Rajchles S; Saad A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Dec; 38(12):2186-91. PubMed ID: 23084361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical penetration of a femtosecond laser-created laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis flap.
Shah SA; Stark WJ
Cornea; 2010 Mar; 29(3):336-8. PubMed ID: 20098318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consultation section. Refractive surgical problem.
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Jan; 37(1):212-6. PubMed ID: 21183117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Wavefront-guided ablation: evidence for efficacy compared to traditional ablation.
Awwad ST
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jun; 141(6):1169; author reply 1169. PubMed ID: 16765706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
