183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24857511)
21. Experimental validation of atomic force microscopy-based cell elasticity measurements.
Harris AR; Charras GT
Nanotechnology; 2011 Aug; 22(34):345102. PubMed ID: 21795774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Capturing the elasticity and morphology of live fibroblast cell cultures during degradation with atomic force microscopy.
Aifantis KE; Shrivastava S; Pelidou SH
J Microsc; 2013 Jan; 249(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 23116192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Can common adhesion molecules and microtopography affect cellular elasticity? A combined atomic force microscopy and optical study.
McPhee G; Dalby MJ; Riehle M; Yin H
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2010 Oct; 48(10):1043-53. PubMed ID: 20623199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cell visco-elasticity measured with AFM and optical trapping at sub-micrometer deformations.
Nawaz S; Sánchez P; Bodensiek K; Li S; Simons M; Schaap IA
PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45297. PubMed ID: 23028915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Direct detection of cellular adaptation to local cyclic stretching at the single cell level by atomic force microscopy.
Watanabe-Nakayama T; Machida SI; Harada I; Sekiguchi H; Afrin R; Ikai A
Biophys J; 2011 Feb; 100(3):564-572. PubMed ID: 21281570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cell dynamic adhesion and elastic properties probed with cylindrical atomic force microscopy cantilever tips.
Rico F; Roca-Cusachs P; Sunyer R; Farré R; Navajas D
J Mol Recognit; 2007; 20(6):459-66. PubMed ID: 17891755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Temporal analysis of vascular smooth muscle cell elasticity and adhesion reveals oscillation waveforms that differ with aging.
Zhu Y; Qiu H; Trzeciakowski JP; Sun Z; Li Z; Hong Z; Hill MA; Hunter WC; Vatner DE; Vatner SF; Meininger GA
Aging Cell; 2012 Oct; 11(5):741-50. PubMed ID: 22639979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Correlation between effects of 24 different cytochalasins on cellular structures and cellular events and those on actin in vitro.
Yahara I; Harada F; Sekita S; Yoshihira K; Natori S
J Cell Biol; 1982 Jan; 92(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 7199054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The influence of physical and physiological cues on atomic force microscopy-based cell stiffness assessment.
Chiou YW; Lin HK; Tang MJ; Lin HH; Yeh ML
PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e77384. PubMed ID: 24194882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The influence of topographic microstructures on the initial adhesion of L929 fibroblasts studied by single-cell force spectroscopy.
Elter P; Weihe T; Lange R; Gimsa J; Beck U
Eur Biophys J; 2011 Mar; 40(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 21153809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Compaction of cell shape occurs before decrease of elasticity in CHO-K1 cells treated with actin cytoskeleton disrupting drug cytochalasin D.
Schulze C; Müller K; Käs JA; Gerdelmann JC
Cell Motil Cytoskeleton; 2009 Apr; 66(4):193-201. PubMed ID: 19235199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Focal adhesion kinase stabilizes the cytoskeleton.
Fabry B; Klemm AH; Kienle S; Schäffer TE; Goldmann WH
Biophys J; 2011 Nov; 101(9):2131-8. PubMed ID: 22067150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Heterogeneous cell mechanical properties: an atomic force microscopy study.
Simon A; Cohen-Bouhacina T; Aimé JP; Porte MC; Amédée J; Baquey C
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2004 May; 50(3):255-66. PubMed ID: 15209346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of small doses of cytochalasins on fibroblasts: preferential changes of active edges and focal contacts.
Domnina LV; Gelfand VI; Ivanova OY; Leonova EV; Pletjushkina OY; Vasiliev JM; Gelfand IM
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1982 Dec; 79(24):7754-7. PubMed ID: 6961447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Different Organization of Type I Collagen Immobilized on Silanized and Nonsilanized Titanium Surfaces Affects Fibroblast Adhesion and Fibronectin Secretion.
Marín-Pareja N; Cantini M; González-García C; Salvagni E; Salmerón-Sánchez M; Ginebra MP
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2015 Sep; 7(37):20667-77. PubMed ID: 26322620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Investigating the cytoskeleton of chicken cardiocytes with the atomic force microscope.
Hofmann UG; Rotsch C; Parak WJ; Radmacher M
J Struct Biol; 1997 Jul; 119(2):84-91. PubMed ID: 9245747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cytoskeletal role in differential adhesion patterns of normal fibroblasts and breast cancer cells inside silicon microenvironments.
Nikkhah M; Strobl JS; Peddi B; Agah M
Biomed Microdevices; 2009 Jun; 11(3):585-95. PubMed ID: 19089620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Softening of the actin cytoskeleton by inhibition of myosin II.
Martens JC; Radmacher M
Pflugers Arch; 2008 Apr; 456(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 18231808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Treatment of neutrophils with cytochalasins converts rolling to stationary adhesion on P-selectin.
Sheikh S; Nash GB
J Cell Physiol; 1998 Feb; 174(2):206-16. PubMed ID: 9428807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. On atomic force microscopy and the constitutive behavior of living cells.
Na S; Sun Z; Meininger GA; Humphrey JD
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2004 Nov; 3(2):75-84. PubMed ID: 15322929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
