BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24858198)

  • 1. Adhesion prevention after cesarean delivery: evidence, and lack of it.
    Walfisch A; Beloosesky R; Shrim A; Hallak M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):446-52. PubMed ID: 24858198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of closure versus nonclosure of peritoneum at cesarean section on adhesions: a prospective randomized study.
    Kapustian V; Anteby EY; Gdalevich M; Shenhav S; Lavie O; Gemer O
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jan; 206(1):56.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21924397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incidence of significant adhesions at repeat cesarean section and the relationship to method of prior peritoneal closure.
    Myers SA; Bennett TL
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Sep; 50(9):659-62. PubMed ID: 16363753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rectus muscle and visceral peritoneum closure at cesarean delivery and intraabdominal adhesions.
    Lyell DJ; Caughey AB; Hu E; Blumenfeld Y; El-Sayed YY; Daniels K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):515.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22463952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adhesion prevention in patients with multiple cesarean deliveries.
    Bates GW; Shomento S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Dec; 205(6 Suppl):S19-24. PubMed ID: 22114994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Closure or non closure of the peritoneum at cesarean section in 2008?].
    Doret M; Gaucherand P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Sep; 37(5):463-8. PubMed ID: 18495379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peritoneal closure at primary cesarean delivery and adhesions.
    Lyell DJ; Caughey AB; Hu E; Daniels K
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 106(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 16055575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Non-closure of peritoneum at cesarean section. Results from repeat cesarean sections].
    Nather A; Zeisler H; Sam CE; Husslein P; Joura EA
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2001 Jun; 113(11-12):451-3. PubMed ID: 11467092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incidence of adhesions at repeat cesarean delivery.
    Hamel KJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):e31-2. PubMed ID: 17466672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of visceral peritoneal closure on scar formation at cesarean delivery.
    Malvasi A; Tinelli A; Farine D; Rahimi S; Cavallotti C; Vergara D; Martignago R; Stark M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 May; 105(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 19232595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. To close or not to close? A systematic review and a meta-analysis of peritoneal non-closure and adhesion formation after caesarean section.
    Cheong YC; Premkumar G; Metwally M; Peacock JL; Li TC
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Nov; 147(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 19596507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-closure versus closure of peritoneum during cesarean section: a randomized study.
    Zareian Z; Zareian P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006; 128(1-2):267-9. PubMed ID: 16716491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Closure vs. nonclosure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery.
    Yiyang Z; Qunxi C; Weiling W
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Aug; 94(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 16784747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-closure of peritoneum and adhesions: the repeat cesarean section.
    Joura EA; Nather A; Husslein P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2001 Mar; 80(3):286. PubMed ID: 11207502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective study of non-closure or closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery in 124 women: Impact of prior peritoneal closure at primary cesarean on the interval time between first cesarean section and the next pregnancy and significant adhesion at second cesarean.
    Komoto Y; Shimoya K; Shimizu T; Kimura T; Hayashi S; Temma-Asano K; Kanagawa T; Fukuda H; Murata Y
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2006 Aug; 32(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 16882265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term outcomes of two different surgical techniques for cesarean.
    Nabhan AF
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Jan; 100(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 17904561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Clinical observation of Stark cesarean section as secondary abdominal surgery].
    Ma YY; Zhu XL; Dong Y; Wang YQ; Zheng ZM; Zhang RJ; Xu Y; Zhao JJ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Nov; 40(11):729-31. PubMed ID: 16324243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parietal peritoneal closure at caesarean section revisited.
    Kroon N; Reginald PW
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Feb; 27(2):159-60. PubMed ID: 17454464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Postoperative adhesions: from formation to prevention.
    Alpay Z; Saed GM; Diamond MP
    Semin Reprod Med; 2008 Jul; 26(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 18756408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Closure vs non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean delivery: 16 year study.
    Weerawetwat W; Buranawanich S; Kanawong M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Sep; 87(9):1007-11. PubMed ID: 15515998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.