148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24858309)
21. Aging and spatial localization during feature search.
Owsley C; Burton-Danner K; Jackson GR
Gerontology; 2000; 46(6):300-5. PubMed ID: 11044783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accessory stimuli speed reaction times and reduce distraction in a target-distractor task.
Tudge L; Schubert T
J Vis; 2016 May; 16(7):11. PubMed ID: 27183193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Object-based visual attention in 8-month-old infants: evidence from an eye-tracking study.
Bulf H; Valenza E
Dev Psychol; 2013 Oct; 49(10):1909-18. PubMed ID: 23276133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The search for oculomotor inhibition: interactions with working memory.
Van der Stigchel S
Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(6):429-35. PubMed ID: 20178939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. What we remember affects how we see: spatial working memory steers saccade programming.
Wong JH; Peterson MS
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Feb; 75(2):308-21. PubMed ID: 23093301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Saccade target selection: Do distractors affect saccade accuracy?
Findlay JM; Blythe HI
Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1267-74. PubMed ID: 18691610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Different spatial representations guide eye and hand movements.
Lisi M; Cavanagh P
J Vis; 2017 Feb; 17(2):12. PubMed ID: 28245493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. How longer saccade latencies lead to a competition for salience.
de Vries JP; Hooge IT; Wiering MA; Verstraten FA
Psychol Sci; 2011 Jul; 22(7):916-23. PubMed ID: 21632518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Visual search asymmetry depends on target-distractor feature similarity: Is the asymmetry simply a result of distractor rejection speed?
Zhang YR; Onyper S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):80-97. PubMed ID: 31359376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The visual search of an illusory figure: a comparison between 6-month-old infants and adults.
Bulf H; Valenza E; Simion F
Perception; 2009; 38(9):1313-27. PubMed ID: 19911629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) or continuous unilateral distal experimental pain stimulation in healthy subjects does not bias visual attention towards one hemifield.
Filippopulos FM; Grafenstein J; Straube A; Eggert T
Exp Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 233(11):3291-9. PubMed ID: 26238407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
Kumada T
Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Visual search and foraging compared in a large-scale search task.
Smith AD; Hood BM; Gilchrist ID
Cogn Process; 2008 May; 9(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 18188627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multisensory interactions in saccade target selection: curved saccade trajectories.
Doyle MC; Walker R
Exp Brain Res; 2002 Jan; 142(1):116-30. PubMed ID: 11797089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Presaccadic target competition attenuates distraction.
DiQuattro NE; Geng JJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1087-1096. PubMed ID: 28160238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of perceptual and motor decisions via confidence judgments and saccade curvature.
Cardoso-Leite P; Gorea A
J Neurophysiol; 2009 Jun; 101(6):2822-36. PubMed ID: 19261707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The time course of top-down control on saccade averaging.
Heeman J; Theeuwes J; Van der Stigchel S
Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():29-37. PubMed ID: 24732567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The influence of distractors on express saccades.
Heeman J; Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J
J Vis; 2017 Jan; 17(1):35. PubMed ID: 28129419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Shortening and prolongation of saccade latencies following microsaccades.
Rolfs M; Laubrock J; Kliegl R
Exp Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 169(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 16328308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Saccadic reaction times in infants and adults: Spatiotemporal factors, gender, and interlaboratory variation.
Kenward B; Koch FS; Forssman L; Brehm J; Tidemann I; Sundqvist A; Marciszko C; Hermansen TK; Heimann M; Gredebäck G
Dev Psychol; 2017 Sep; 53(9):1750-1764. PubMed ID: 28682097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
