184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24859176)
1. Biomechanical analysis of distal femoral fracture fixation: dynamic condylar screw versus locked compression plate.
Narsaria N; Singh AK; Rastogi A; Singh V
J Orthop Sci; 2014 Sep; 19(5):770-5. PubMed ID: 24859176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of dynamic condylar screw and locking compression plate fixation in unstable distal femoral fractures: An in vitro study.
Singh AK; Rastogi A; Singh V
Indian J Orthop; 2013 Nov; 47(6):615-20. PubMed ID: 24379469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Internal fixation of type-C distal femoral fractures in osteoporotic bone: surgical technique.
Mückley T; Wähnert D; Hoffmeier KL; von Oldenburg G; Fröber R; Hofmann GO
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Mar; 93 Suppl 1():40-53. PubMed ID: 21411685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical analysis of distal femur fracture fixation: fixed-angle screw-plate construct versus condylar blade plate.
Higgins TF; Pittman G; Hines J; Bachus KN
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Jan; 21(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 17211268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of trigen retrograde intramedullary (i.m.) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate.
Heiney JP; Barnett MD; Vrabec GA; Schoenfeld AJ; Baji A; Njus GO
J Trauma; 2009 Feb; 66(2):443-9. PubMed ID: 19204519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A biomechanical comparison of locked plate fixation with percutaneous insertion capability versus the angled blade plate in a subtrochanteric fracture gap model.
Crist BD; Khalafi A; Hazelwood SJ; Lee MA
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):622-7. PubMed ID: 19897982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Internal fixation of type-C distal femoral fractures in osteoporotic bone.
Wähnert D; Hoffmeier KL; von Oldenburg G; Fröber R; Hofmann GO; Mückley T
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Jun; 92(6):1442-52. PubMed ID: 20516320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Locked plating of comminuted distal femur fractures: does unlocked screw placement affect stability and failure?
Cui S; Bledsoe JG; Israel H; Watson JT; Cannada LK
J Orthop Trauma; 2014 Feb; 28(2):90-6. PubMed ID: 23860132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Supracondylar femur fracture fixation: mechanical comparison of the 95 degrees condylar side plate and screw versus 95 degrees angled blade plate.
Jaakkola JI; Lundy DW; Moore T; Jones B; Ganey TM; Hutton WC
Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Jan; 73(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 11928916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical analysis of the less invasive stabilization system for mechanically unstable fractures of the distal femur: comparison of titanium versus stainless steel and bicortical versus unicortical fixation.
Beingessner D; Moon E; Barei D; Morshed S
J Trauma; 2011 Sep; 71(3):620-4. PubMed ID: 21610539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vertically oriented femoral neck fractures: mechanical analysis of four fixation techniques.
Aminian A; Gao F; Fedoriw WW; Zhang LQ; Kalainov DM; Merk BR
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Sep; 21(8):544-8. PubMed ID: 17805021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of cement-augmented condylar screws in locking plate osteosynthesis for distal femoral fractures - A biomechanical analysis.
Bliemel C; Oberkircher L; Bockmann B; Petzold E; Aigner R; Heyse TJ; Ruchholtz S; Buecking B
Injury; 2016 Dec; 47(12):2688-2693. PubMed ID: 27773369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of hybrid plating with locked and nonlocked screws on the strength of locked plating constructs in the osteoporotic diaphysis.
Doornink J; Fitzpatrick DC; Boldhaus S; Madey SM; Bottlang M
J Trauma; 2010 Aug; 69(2):411-7. PubMed ID: 20699751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical considerations in plate osteosynthesis: the effect of plate-to-bone compression with and without angular screw stability.
Stoffel K; Lorenz KU; Kuster MS
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Jul; 21(6):362-8. PubMed ID: 17620993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical evaluation of fracture fixation constructs using a variable-angle locked periprosthetic femur plate system.
Hoffmann MF; Burgers TA; Mason JJ; Williams BO; Sietsema DL; Jones CB
Injury; 2014 Jul; 45(7):1035-41. PubMed ID: 24680467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative biomechanical analysis of supracondylar femur fracture fixation: locked intramedullary nail versus 95-degree angled plate.
David SM; Harrow ME; Peindl RD; Frick SL; Kellam JF
J Orthop Trauma; 1997 Jul; 11(5):344-50. PubMed ID: 9294798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial-type locking plates and a fixed-angle locking plate for internal fixation of distal femur fractures.
Otto RJ; Moed BR; Bledsoe JG
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 19897986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical evaluation of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation.
Zdero R; Walker R; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 May; 90(5):1068-77. PubMed ID: 18451400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of the standard condylar buttress plate, a locked buttress plate, and the 95-degree blade plate.
Koval KJ; Hoehl JJ; Kummer FJ; Simon JA
J Orthop Trauma; 1997 Oct; 11(7):521-4. PubMed ID: 9334954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
